How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Julia Temple Healthcare Center
3401 S Lafayette St, Englewood, CO 80113 (opens Google Maps) · Arapahoe County · (303) 761-0075· 128 certified beds · avg 106 residents/day · certified since Apr 15, 1994 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 10, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.94
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. F-0881
The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. F-0676
The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. F-0679
View all 13 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Dec 10, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Dec 10, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Dec 10, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Dec 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Dec 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Dec 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · from a complaint · F-0660 |
| Dec 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jul 27, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 7).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityColorado averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.94
Colorado average: 3.89
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.62
Colorado average: 0.86
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.48
Colorado average: 3.44
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Colorado avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.94 | 3.89 | 3.95 | top 38% in Colorado; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.62 | 0.86 | 0.69 | bottom 27% in Colorado; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.48 | 3.44 | 3.50 | top 38% in Colorado; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.37 | 0.61 | 0.48 | bottom 19% in Colorado; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | — | 47.1 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 44.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.79, RN 0.59, weekend 3.34.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.79 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Julia Temple Healthcare Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boyles, Eddy | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/20/2010 |
| Boyles, Eddy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/20/2010 |
| Boyles, Eddy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/09/2025 |
| Burnam, Soon | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/14/2013 |
| Burnam, Soon | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/09/2025 |
| Caretrust GP LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2009 |
| Caretrust Reit INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2009 |
| Ctr Partnership LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2009 |
| Dunyon, David | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Ensign Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2009 |
| Gahm, Gregory | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Gahm, Gregory | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Gahm, Gregory | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/09/2025 |
| Jorgensen, David | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Keetch, Chad | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2011 |
| Lafayette Health Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2009 |
| Port, Barry | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/09/2025 |
| Sato, Ami | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/09/2024 |
All 18 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Ensign Group — 342 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Lakeshore Post Acute and Rehabilitation Center — Pueblo, CO · overall 4/5
- Littleton Care and Rehabilitation Center — Littleton, CO · overall 5/5
- Malley Transitional Care Center — Northglenn, CO · overall 2/5
- Mapleton Post Acute — Lakewood, CO · overall 4/5
- McIntosh Care and Rehabilitation Center — Longmont, CO · overall 3/5
- Medallion Post Acute Rehabilitation — Colorado Springs, CO · overall 1/5
- Oakwood Care and Rehabilitation — Lakewood, CO · overall 1/5abuse
- Parker Post Acute — Parker, CO · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 341 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Who oversees antibiotic use here, and how do you decide when an antibiotic is really needed?"
- "How do you help residents maintain their daily living skills, and how do you measure whether it's working?"
- "Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you prepare residents and families for discharge, and what support do you arrange for after they leave?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 18 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 82 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Englewood Post Acute and Rehabilitation | 0.6 mi | Englewood, CO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Wellsprings Care Center | 0.6 mi | Englewood, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Suites at Clermont Park Care Center, the | 1.9 mi | Denver, CO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| South Valley Post Acute Rehabilitation | 2.5 mi | Denver, CO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Brookshire Post Acute | 2.7 mi | Denver, CO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Amberwood Post Acute | 2.7 mi | Denver, CO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Rowan Community, INC | 2.8 mi | Denver, CO | ★★★★☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cherrelyn Healthcare Center | 2.9 mi | Littleton, CO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Holly Heights Care and Rehabilitation | 3.0 mi | Denver, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Highline Post Acute | 3.0 mi | Denver, CO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Heights Care & Rehabilitation LLC | 3.2 mi | Denver, CO | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Hallmark Nursing Center | 3.9 mi | Denver, CO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Arapahoe, CO — 19 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Life Care Center of Aurora — Aurora, CO · overall 5/5
- Life Care Center of Littleton — Littleton, CO · overall 3/5
- Littleton Care and Rehabilitation Center — Littleton, CO · overall 5/5
- Lowry Hills Care and Rehabilitation — Aurora, CO · overall 2/5
- Orchard Park Health Care Center — Littleton, CO · overall 4/5
- Suites at Holly Creek Care Center, the — Centennial, CO · overall 5/5
- Suites at Someren Glen Care Center, the — Centennial, CO · overall 2/5
- The Springs at St. Andrews Village — Aurora, CO · overall 3/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 065322.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).