How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Orchard Park Health Care Center
6005 S Holly St, Littleton, CO 80121 (opens Google Maps) · Arapahoe County · (303) 773-1000· 133 certified beds · avg 121 residents/day · certified since Jun 19, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CLEAR CHOICE HEALTHCARE (8 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 14, 2026
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Jun 19, 2025
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.52
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 19, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 19, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 15, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. F-0842
View all 14 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 14, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 14, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jun 19, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jun 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Jun 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| May 9, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint · F-0804 |
| May 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Jan 26, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Jan 26, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Jan 26, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 26, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Jan 26, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jan 26, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 3).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2026
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 3 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityColorado averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.52
Colorado average: 3.89
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.65
Colorado average: 0.86
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.78
Colorado average: 3.44
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Colorado avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.52 | 3.89 | 3.95 | top 18% in Colorado; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.65 | 0.86 | 0.69 | bottom 31% in Colorado; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.78 | 3.44 | 3.50 | top 25% in Colorado; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.38 | 0.61 | 0.48 | bottom 20% in Colorado; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.0 | 47.1 | 45.8 | bottom 41% in Colorado; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 68.8 | 44.6 | 42.9 | bottom 10% in Colorado; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.08, RN 0.59, weekend 3.41.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.08 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Orchard Park Health Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clear Choice Health Care LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2007 |
| Kennedy, Deborah | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/12/2009 |
| Partee, Leslie | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/09/2009 |
| Peabody, Scott | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2009 |
| Sylvain, Thomas | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2012 |
All 5 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Clear Choice Healthcare — 8 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Belleair Health Care Center — Clearwater, FL · overall 4/5
- Centre Pointe Health and Rehab Center — Tallahassee, FL · overall 4/5
- Conway Lakes Health & Rehabilitation Center — Orlando, FL · overall 2/5
- East Bay Rehabilitation Center — Clearwater, FL · overall 4/5
- Melbourne Terrace Rehabilitation Center — Melbourne, FL · overall 4/5
- Port Charlotte Rehabilitation Center — Port Charlotte, FL · overall 1/5
- Spring Lake Rehabilitation Center — Winter Haven, FL · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 50% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 79 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suites at Holly Creek Care Center, the | 0.6 mi | Centennial, CO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Suites at Someren Glen Care Center, the | 1.0 mi | Centennial, CO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Brookdale Greenwood Village | 2.2 mi | Greenwood Village, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cherrelyn Healthcare Center | 3.8 mi | Littleton, CO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Julia Temple Healthcare Center | 4.2 mi | Englewood, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Wellsprings Care Center | 4.3 mi | Englewood, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Englewood Post Acute and Rehabilitation | 4.4 mi | Englewood, CO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| VI at Highlands Ranch Skilled Nursing | 4.5 mi | Highlands Ranch, CO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Suites at Clermont Park Care Center, the | 4.5 mi | Denver, CO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Holly Heights Care and Rehabilitation | 4.6 mi | Denver, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Highline Post Acute | 4.6 mi | Denver, CO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Brookshire Post Acute | 5.0 mi | Denver, CO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Arapahoe, CO — 19 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- The Springs at St. Andrews Village — Aurora, CO · overall 3/5
- University Heights Care Center — Aurora, CO · overall 3/5abuse
- Advanced Health Care of Aurora — Aurora, CO · overall 5/5
- Beth Israel at Shalom Park — Aurora, CO · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 065259.