ColoradoCentennial

Suites at Someren Glen Care Center, the

5000 E Arapahoe Rd, Centennial, CO 80122 · Arapahoe County · 109 certified beds · avg 85 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1996

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$36,446
Fines, last 3 years
5.00
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 25, 2024 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 23, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 12, 2020 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 20, 2020 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (31)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 8, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint
May 8, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
May 8, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
May 8, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
May 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
May 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
May 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
May 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
May 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
May 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
May 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
May 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Apr 25, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Feb 12, 2020▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 12, 2020F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 12, 2020F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 12, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 12, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 17).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202051G ▲
202461G ▲
202520D
2026180E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $36,446, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 25, 2024Fine$36,446
Apr 25, 2024Payment Denial32 days from May 23, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityColorado avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.003.893.95top 11% in Colorado; top 13% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.270.860.69top 12% in Colorado; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.623.443.50top 9% in Colorado; top 10% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.060.610.48top 7% in Colorado; top 5% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)51.847.145.8bottom 35% in Colorado; bottom 32% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)60.744.642.9bottom 18% in Colorado; bottom 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.63, RN 1.18, weekend 4.28. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Christian Living NeighborhoodsOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/1996
Childs, BryonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2007
Childs, BryonIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2007
Childs, BryonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/28/2007
Christian Living NeighborhoodsOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/1996
Christian Living NeighborhoodsOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2025
Fralick, TraciIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/05/2018
Fralick, TraciIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/05/2018
Fralick, TraciIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/05/2018
Franken, JanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Franken, JanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2018
Keller, JayneIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Keller, JayneIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Keller, JayneIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Vitale-Aussem, JillIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/15/2020
Vitale-Aussem, JillIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/15/2020
Vitale-Aussem, JillIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/15/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Suites at Holly Creek Care Center, the0.6 miCentennial, CO★★★★★4/5
Orchard Park Health Care Center1.0 miLittleton, CO★★★★☆4/5
Brookdale Greenwood Village2.7 miGreenwood Village, CO★★★☆☆2/5
VI at Highlands Ranch Skilled Nursing3.5 miHighlands Ranch, CO★★★★★5/5
Cherrelyn Healthcare Center3.5 miLittleton, CO★★★★☆4/5
Life Care Center of Littleton4.5 miLittleton, CO★★★☆☆2/5
Wellsprings Care Center4.6 miEnglewood, CO★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Julia Temple Healthcare Center4.7 miEnglewood, CO★★★☆☆3/5
Englewood Post Acute and Rehabilitation4.7 miEnglewood, CO★★★★☆4/5
Suites at Clermont Park Care Center, the5.3 miDenver, CO★★★★★5/5
Littleton Care and Rehabilitation Center5.4 miLittleton, CO★★★★★5/5
Holly Heights Care and Rehabilitation5.5 miDenver, CO★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Centennial →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 065345.