How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Englewood Post Acute and Rehabilitation
3575 S Washington St, Englewood, CO 80113 (opens Google Maps) · Arapahoe County · (303) 789-2265· 82 certified beds · avg 73 residents/day · certified since Sep 19, 1968 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Nov 7, 2024
3
Serious findings on record
most recent Jun 6, 2023
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.34
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 6, 2023 · F-0684
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 6, 2023 · F-0684
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 3, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 10, 2020 · F-0684
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 10, 2020 · F-0684
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 20, 2020 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 10, 2020 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 10, 2020 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 20, 2020 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
View all 16 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jun 6, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jun 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Jun 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Jun 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · F-0742 |
| Mar 10, 2020 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Mar 10, 2020 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Mar 10, 2020 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 10, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Mar 10, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Mar 10, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 6).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2020
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 2
2023
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2024
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 6 | 2 | G ▲ |
| 2023 | 4 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityColorado averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.34
Colorado average: 3.89
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.70
Colorado average: 0.86
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.88
Colorado average: 3.44
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Colorado avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.34 | 3.89 | 3.95 | bottom 25% in Colorado; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.70 | 0.86 | 0.69 | bottom 36% in Colorado; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.88 | 3.44 | 3.50 | bottom 20% in Colorado; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.51 | 0.61 | 0.48 | bottom 44% in Colorado; top 32% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 32.3 | 47.1 | 45.8 | top 16% in Colorado; top 18% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 41.7 | 44.6 | 42.9 | top 41% in Colorado; top 50% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.13, RN 0.65, weekend 2.70.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.13 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Englewood Post Acute and Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burnam, Soon | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2014 |
| Dunyon, David | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2014 |
| Ensign Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2014 |
| Fisher, Candace | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2014 |
| Fisher, Candace | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2014 |
| Fisher, Candace | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2014 |
| Horton, Christopher | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/17/2020 |
| Horton, Christopher | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/17/2020 |
| Horton, Christopher | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/17/2020 |
| Jorgensen, David | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2014 |
| Keetch, Chad | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2011 |
| Port, Barry | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/07/2025 |
| Sato, Ami | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/09/2024 |
| Ventas, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2014 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Ensign Group — 342 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Hampden Hills Post Acute — Aurora, CO · overall 2/5
- Holly Heights Care and Rehabilitation — Denver, CO · overall 3/5
- Irondale Post Acute — Commerce City, CO · overall 2/5SFF
- Julia Temple Healthcare Center — Englewood, CO · overall 3/5
- Lakeshore Post Acute and Rehabilitation Center — Pueblo, CO · overall 4/5
- Littleton Care and Rehabilitation Center — Littleton, CO · overall 5/5
- Malley Transitional Care Center — Northglenn, CO · overall 2/5
- Mapleton Post Acute — Lakewood, CO · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 341 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Colorado midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 32% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 14 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 83 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wellsprings Care Center | 0.1 mi | Englewood, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Julia Temple Healthcare Center | 0.6 mi | Englewood, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Suites at Clermont Park Care Center, the | 2.5 mi | Denver, CO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Cherrelyn Healthcare Center | 2.5 mi | Littleton, CO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Heights Care & Rehabilitation LLC | 2.7 mi | Denver, CO | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| South Valley Post Acute Rehabilitation | 3.0 mi | Denver, CO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Brookshire Post Acute | 3.3 mi | Denver, CO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Amberwood Post Acute | 3.3 mi | Denver, CO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Rowan Community, INC | 3.3 mi | Denver, CO | ★★★★☆ | 2/5 | |
| Hallmark Nursing Center | 3.4 mi | Denver, CO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Holly Heights Care and Rehabilitation | 3.6 mi | Denver, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Highline Post Acute | 3.6 mi | Denver, CO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Arapahoe, CO — 19 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Garden Terrace Alzheimer's Center of Excellence — Aurora, CO · overall 4/5
- Hampden Hills Post Acute — Aurora, CO · overall 2/5
- Highland Park Rehabilitation & Care Center — Aurora, CO · overall 5/5
- Life Care Center of Aurora — Aurora, CO · overall 5/5
- Life Care Center of Littleton — Littleton, CO · overall 3/5
- Littleton Care and Rehabilitation Center — Littleton, CO · overall 5/5
- Lowry Hills Care and Rehabilitation — Aurora, CO · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 065077.