920 E Ave L, Silsbee, TX 77656 (opens Google Maps) · Hardin County · (409) 385-5571· 160 certified beds · avg 143 residents/day · certified since Feb 29, 2004 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Sep 15, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 11, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. F-0640
The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. F-0908
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Jan 28, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Jan 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Jan 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jan 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jan 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · F-0790 |
| Sep 15, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 6 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $8,193.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2023 | Fine | $8,193 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.59 | 3.46 | 3.95 | top 30% in Texas; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.14 | 0.44 | 0.69 | bottom 2% in Texas; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.21 | 3.04 | 3.50 | top 28% in Texas; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.08 | 0.34 | 0.48 | bottom 1% in Texas; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | — | 55.3 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 54.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.10, RN 0.12, weekend 2.78.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.10 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Silsbee Oaks Health Care LLP. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnold, Jason | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2001 |
| Arnold, Jason | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/13/2025 |
| Burmont, INC. | Organization | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2001 |
| Burns, Deanna | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/08/2022 |
| Burns, Deanna | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/13/2025 |
| Huff, Jeremy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/18/2011 |
| Jacobs, Patricia | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/08/2022 |
| Montgomery, Mitchell | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2001 |
| Montgomery, Mitchell | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/13/2025 |
| Montgomery, Raymond | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2001 |
| Montgomery, Raymond | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/13/2025 |
| Oak Management | Organization | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2001 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mill Creek | 1.3 mi | Silsbee, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Paradigm at the Pines | 1.3 mi | Silsbee, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Village Creek Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 5.9 mi | Lumberton, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Paradigm at Kountze | 9.0 mi | Kountze, TX | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Jefferson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 15.6 mi | Beaumont, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Harmony Care at Beaumont | 16.7 mi | Beaumont, TX | —/5 | abuseSFF | |
| Vidor Health & Rehabilitation Center | 17.1 mi | Vidor, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Oakwood Manor Nursing Home | 17.9 mi | Vidor, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Calder Woods | 18.6 mi | Beaumont, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Beaumont Health Care Center | 19.0 mi | Beaumont, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| College Street Health Care Center | 19.1 mi | Beaumont, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Spindletop Hill Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 19.1 mi | Beaumont, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676008.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details