Calder Woods
7080 Calder, Beaumont, TX 77706 · Jefferson County · 46 certified beds · avg 37 residents/day · certified since Aug 9, 2006
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 7, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
All citations in the current public record (20)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2026 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jan 30, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Jan 30, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jan 30, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Oct 7, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Aug 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint |
| Aug 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Aug 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Jan 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Nov 6, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Nov 6, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Oct 17, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint |
| Oct 17, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Feb 26, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint |
| Feb 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · from a complaint |
| Feb 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint |
| Feb 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Oct 11, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Oct 11, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Oct 11, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 4).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 5 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $14,069.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2025 | Fine | $14,069 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 6.23 | 3.46 | 3.95 | top 1% in Texas; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.71 | 0.44 | 0.69 | top 9% in Texas; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 6.03 | 3.04 | 3.50 | top 1% in Texas; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.41 | 0.34 | 0.48 | top 25% in Texas; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 69.1 | 55.3 | 45.8 | bottom 20% in Texas; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 80.0 | 54.6 | 42.9 | bottom 21% in Texas; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.90, RN 0.67, weekend 5.71. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
Non profit - Other
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buckner Baptist Benevolences | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2000 |
| Buckner Retirement Services INC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2000 |
| Buckner Retirement Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/09/2025 |
| Moore, Jessica | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2012 |
| Moore, Jessica | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2012 |
| Robbins, Kenneth | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/25/2025 |
| Robbins, Kenneth | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/25/2025 |
| Robbins, Kenneth | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/21/2025 |
| Robbins, Kenneth | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/21/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beaumont Health Care Center | 1.2 mi | Beaumont, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Focused Care at Summer Place | 1.8 mi | Beaumont, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Spindletop Hill Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 1.9 mi | Beaumont, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Avir at Beaumont | 2.1 mi | Beaumont, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Beaumont Nursing and Rehabilitation | 2.2 mi | Beaumont, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| College Street Health Care Center | 2.2 mi | Beaumont, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Jefferson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 3.1 mi | Beaumont, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Harmony Care at Beaumont | 3.6 mi | Beaumont, TX | —/5 | abuseSFF | |
| Oakwood Manor Nursing Home | 10.3 mi | Vidor, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Vidor Health & Rehabilitation Center | 10.7 mi | Vidor, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Village Creek Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 13.1 mi | Lumberton, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Port Arthur Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 14.0 mi | Port Arthur, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676109.