Indiana ›New Castle

Hickory Creek at New Castle

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

901 N 16th Street, New Castle, IN 47362 (opens Google Maps) · Henry County · (765) 529-4695· 36 certified beds · avg 31 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1992 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES (90 facilities, chain avg rating 3.9★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 29, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.91
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656

View all 16 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 29, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600
May 29, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
May 29, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
May 29, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
May 29, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697
May 29, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757
Aug 12, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600
Aug 12, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · from a complaint · F-0740
Aug 12, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · from a complaint · F-0745
May 8, 2025F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727
May 8, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
May 8, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558
May 8, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
May 8, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Apr 5, 2024F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727
Apr 5, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202420F
202580F
202660D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityIndiana averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.91
Indiana average: 3.42
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.45
Indiana average: 0.62
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.67
Indiana average: 3.01
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityIndiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.913.423.95bottom 22% in Indiana; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.450.620.69bottom 27% in Indiana; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.673.013.50bottom 32% in Indiana; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.360.470.48bottom 38% in Indiana; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)69.445.945.8bottom 3% in Indiana; bottom 6% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)—40.442.9—

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.55, RN 0.54, weekend 3.25.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.55 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Hickory Creek at New Castle. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Other

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Henry County Memorial HospitalOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%08/01/2013
American Senior Communities LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2021
American Senior Communities LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/24/2025
Chies, StevenIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2021
Dice, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Dice, MarkIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2023
Dynes, SheldonIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Dynes, SheldonIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Henry County Memorial HospitalOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/07/2025
Hiltz, JeffreyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Hiltz, JeffreyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/24/2025
Jackson, BlakeIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2021
Jackson, EthanIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2021
Jackson, MarkIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2021
Jackson, MichaelIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/14/2024
Jackson, WessleyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2021
Justice, DavidIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2021
Kelsey, DonnaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2024
Pidgeon, JohnIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Pidgeon, JohnIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013

Showing 20 of 35 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 15 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain American Senior Communities — 90 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 89 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
  • "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
  • "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
  • "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
  • "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
  • "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
  • "What mental health services do you provide on-site, and who delivers them?"
  • "Who provides social services here, and how would they support my family member's emotional and social needs?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Indiana midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 69% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 35 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 20 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Stonebrooke Rehabilitation Center0.1 miNew Castle, IN★★★☆☆3/5
Waters of New Castle, the0.2 miNew Castle, IN★★★☆☆3/5
Willows of New Castle0.2 miNew Castle, IN★★☆☆☆3/5
Glen Oaks Health Campus3.0 miNew Castle, IN★★★★☆3/5
Middletown Nursing and Rehabilitation Center12.2 miMiddletown, IN★★★★☆3/5
Waters of Middletown Skilled Nursing Facility, the12.6 miMiddletown, IN★★★★☆4/5
Waters of Chesterfield Skilled Nursing Facility17.2 miChesterfield, IN★★★★☆4/5
Waters Edge Village17.2 miMuncie, IN★★★★☆3/5
Yorktown Manor17.4 miYorktown, IN★★★★☆4/5
Cardinal Care Strategies17.6 miMuncie, IN★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Brookside Care Strategies17.8 miMuncie, IN—/5abuseSFF
Woodlands the17.8 miMuncie, IN★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in New Castle →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155459.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details