How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1023 N 20th St, New Castle, IN 47362 (opens Google Maps) · Henry County · (765) 529-9694· 95 certified beds · avg 60 residents/day · certified since Mar 14, 1969 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jan 29, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Feb 9, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 22 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. F-0688
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Mar 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Mar 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · from a complaint · F-0744 |
| Mar 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Jul 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Mar 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Mar 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Jan 29, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Jan 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Jan 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Jan 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jan 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jan 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jan 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jan 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jan 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames. · F-0909 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Indiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.03 | 3.42 | 3.95 | bottom 31% in Indiana; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.35 | 0.62 | 0.69 | bottom 11% in Indiana; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.64 | 3.01 | 3.50 | bottom 29% in Indiana; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.39 | 0.47 | 0.48 | bottom 46% in Indiana; top 50% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 58.8 | 45.9 | 45.8 | bottom 16% in Indiana; bottom 18% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 81.3 | 40.4 | 42.9 | bottom 2% in Indiana; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.75, RN 0.44, weekend 3.27.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.75 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Willows of New Castle. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henry County Memorial Hospital | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/2012 |
| Dynes, Sheldon | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| Frankel, Israel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2025 |
| Frankel, Israel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/13/2025 |
| New Castle in Opco, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| New Castle in Opco, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/13/2025 |
| Patton, Elizabeth | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/13/2025 |
| Pidgeon, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| Reis, James | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/13/2025 |
| Ring, Brian | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2022 |
| Shore, Marion | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| Ware, Deborah | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/27/2021 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stonebrooke Rehabilitation Center | 0.2 mi | New Castle, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Hickory Creek at New Castle | 0.2 mi | New Castle, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Waters of New Castle, the | 0.2 mi | New Castle, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Glen Oaks Health Campus | 3.2 mi | New Castle, IN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Middletown Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 12.3 mi | Middletown, IN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Waters of Middletown Skilled Nursing Facility, the | 12.7 mi | Middletown, IN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Waters Edge Village | 17.1 mi | Muncie, IN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Waters of Chesterfield Skilled Nursing Facility | 17.3 mi | Chesterfield, IN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Yorktown Manor | 17.4 mi | Yorktown, IN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Cardinal Care Strategies | 17.5 mi | Muncie, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Envive of Muncie | 17.7 mi | Muncie, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Brookside Care Strategies | 17.7 mi | Muncie, IN | —/5 | abuseSFF |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155089.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details