IndianaNew Castle

Willows of New Castle

1023 N 20th St, New Castle, IN 47362 · Henry County · 95 certified beds · avg 60 residents/day · certified since Mar 14, 1969

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.03
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 29, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 9, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 6, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Jul 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Jan 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jan 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Jan 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jan 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024111G ▲
202560D
202650F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIndiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.033.423.95bottom 31% in Indiana; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.350.620.69bottom 11% in Indiana; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.643.013.50bottom 29% in Indiana; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.390.470.48bottom 46% in Indiana; top 50% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)58.845.945.8bottom 16% in Indiana; bottom 18% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)81.340.442.9bottom 2% in Indiana; bottom 5% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.75, RN 0.44, weekend 3.27. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Henry County Memorial HospitalOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/2012
Dynes, SheldonIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Frankel, IsraelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/08/2025
Frankel, IsraelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/13/2025
New Castle in Opco, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
New Castle in Opco, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/13/2025
Patton, ElizabethIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/13/2025
Pidgeon, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Reis, JamesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/13/2025
Ring, BrianIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
Shore, MarionIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Ware, DeborahIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/27/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Stonebrooke Rehabilitation Center0.2 miNew Castle, IN★★★☆☆3/5
Hickory Creek at New Castle0.2 miNew Castle, IN★★☆☆☆3/5
Waters of New Castle, the0.2 miNew Castle, IN★★★☆☆3/5
Glen Oaks Health Campus3.2 miNew Castle, IN★★★★☆3/5
Middletown Nursing and Rehabilitation Center12.3 miMiddletown, IN★★★★☆3/5
Waters of Middletown Skilled Nursing Facility, the12.7 miMiddletown, IN★★★★☆4/5
Waters Edge Village17.1 miMuncie, IN★★★★☆3/5
Waters of Chesterfield Skilled Nursing Facility17.3 miChesterfield, IN★★★★☆4/5
Yorktown Manor17.4 miYorktown, IN★★★★☆4/5
Cardinal Care Strategies17.5 miMuncie, IN★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Envive of Muncie17.7 miMuncie, IN★★☆☆☆3/5
Brookside Care Strategies17.7 miMuncie, IN—/5abuseSFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in New Castle →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155089.