How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1200 Earhart Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 (opens Google Maps) · Washtenaw County · (734) 769-0177· 105 certified beds · avg 42 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1976 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: TRINITY HEALTH (19 facilities, chain avg rating 3.3★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. F-0814
The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. F-0558
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Mar 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Michigan avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.04 | 4.32 | 3.95 | top 14% in Michigan; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.49 | 0.84 | 0.69 | top 7% in Michigan; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.20 | 3.79 | 3.50 | top 20% in Michigan; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.75 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 15% in Michigan; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | — | 44.1 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 39.2 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.71, RN 1.39, weekend 3.92.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.71 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Glacier Hills. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Continuing Care Services | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/01/2016 |
| Abraham, Tarun | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| Abraham, Tarun | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| Berry, Dale | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2009 |
| Berry, Dale | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| Bowens, Marcus | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/23/2022 |
| Bowens, Marcus | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/23/2022 |
| Byron-Oilar, Amy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| Byron-Oilar, Amy | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| Defrain, David | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2021 |
| Latovick, Pamela | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2017 |
| McKinnon, Benjamin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2022 |
| Skaff, David | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
All 13 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Trinity Health — 19 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 18 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Ann Arbor | 1.6 mi | Ann Arbor, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Regency at Bluffs Park | 3.4 mi | Ann Arbor, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Villa at Willow Place | 4.5 mi | Ypslianti, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Gilbert Residence | 4.9 mi | Ypsilanti, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Villa at Parkridge | 5.3 mi | Ypsilanti, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Regency at Canton | 9.8 mi | Canton, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Evangelical Home - Saline | 9.9 mi | Saline, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Regency at Whitmore Lake | 10.8 mi | Whitmore Lake, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| South Lyon Senior Care and Rehab Center | 11.1 mi | South Lyon, MI | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Canton | 11.9 mi | Canton, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Medilodge of Plymouth | 12.4 mi | Plymouth, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Medilodge of Haggerty Road | 12.9 mi | Plymouth, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Washtenaw, MI — 9 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235223.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details