Evangelical Home - Saline

Name: Evangelical Home - Saline
Address: 440 W Russell, Saline, MI, 48176, US
Telephone: 7344299401

440 W Russell, Saline, MI 48176 · Washtenaw County · 143 certified beds · avg 104 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1975

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

4.99

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (37)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jun 12, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · from a complaint
Jun 12, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Jan 29, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 29, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jan 29, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Jan 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Jan 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jan 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jan 29, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Mar 12, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Nov 22, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Nov 22, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 22, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 22, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 22, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Nov 22, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Nov 22, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Nov 22, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Nov 22, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Nov 22, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Nov 22, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 13, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 13, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Sep 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Sep 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Sep 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Sep 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Sep 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Sep 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Sep 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Sep 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Sep 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 13, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (11 → 11).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2023	12	F
2024	11	F
2025	1	D
2026	13	F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Michigan avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.99	4.32	3.95	top 17% in Michigan; top 13% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.50	0.84	0.69	bottom 19% in Michigan; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.45	3.79	3.50	top 15% in Michigan; top 13% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.25	0.49	0.48	bottom 19% in Michigan; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	51.2	44.1	45.8	bottom 29% in Michigan; bottom 34% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	47.1	39.2	42.9	bottom 33% in Michigan; bottom 40% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.63, RN 0.46, weekend 4.13. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Church related

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Evangelical Homes of Michigan	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	01/01/1971
Anderson, Linda	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2024
Anderson, Linda	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2024
Currenton, James	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2024
Currenton, James	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2024
Evangelical Homes of Michigan	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1971
Holda, Steven	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2024
Mangi, James	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2024
Mangi, James	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2024
Omartian, Charity	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2024
Omartian, Charity	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2024
Snyder, Shannon	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2022
Snyder, Shannon	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2022
Snyder, Shannon	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/13/2025
Stier, Nancylee	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2022
Stier, Nancylee	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2022
Wellings, Julia	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2020
Wellings, Julia	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How do you train staff to treat residents with dignity, and how do you protect residents' personal belongings?"
"If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
"Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Ann Arbor	9.3 mi	Ann Arbor, MI	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
Regency at Bluffs Park	9.3 mi	Ann Arbor, MI	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Glacier Hills	9.9 mi	Ann Arbor, MI	★★★★★	5/5
The Gilbert Residence	10.3 mi	Ypsilanti, MI	★★★☆☆	4/5
The Villa at Parkridge	10.8 mi	Ypsilanti, MI	★★★☆☆	2/5
Villa at Willow Place	12.4 mi	Ypslianti, MI	★★★☆☆	2/5
Chelsea Retirement Community	16.1 mi	Chelsea, MI	★★★★★	5/5
Regency at Canton	17.1 mi	Canton, MI	★★★☆☆	2/5
Regency at Whitmore Lake	18.4 mi	Whitmore Lake, MI	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Special Tree Neurocare Center	19.0 mi	Romulus, MI	★★★★☆	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Saline →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235238.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Evangelical Home - Saline

440 W Russell, Saline, MI 48176 · 7344299401

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 2/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "How do you train staff to treat residents with dignity, and how do you protect residents' personal belongings?"
☐ "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
☐ "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
☐ "Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 235238 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)