Utah ›Ogden

George E. Wahlen Ogden Veterans Home

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

1102 North 1200 West, Ogden, UT 84404 (opens Google Maps) · Weber County · (801) 334-4300· 120 certified beds · avg 113 residents/day · certified since Feb 3, 2010 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: AVALON HEALTH CARE (16 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Aug 7, 2024
3
Serious findings on record
most recent Feb 28, 2025
$12,363
Fines, last 3 years
6.02
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Feb 28, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Feb 28, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Feb 28, 2025 · F-0609 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.

Why it matters: When incidents aren't reported promptly, abusers may continue harming residents and outside authorities can't step in.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Feb 28, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 7, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Sep 4, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated

    The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600

  2. J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated

    The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint F-0695

View all 12 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 28, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600
Feb 28, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
Feb 28, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695
Aug 7, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684
Aug 7, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Aug 7, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0697
Aug 7, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint · F-0732
Aug 7, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint · F-0759
Aug 7, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760
Aug 7, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761
Aug 7, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · from a complaint · F-0801
Aug 7, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812

Inspection trend by year

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2025
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 2

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202491G ▲
202532J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

1 fine totaling $12,363.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 28, 2025Fine$12,363

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityUtah averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 6.02
Utah average: 3.87
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.79
Utah average: 1.17
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 5.31
Utah average: 3.39
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityUtah avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)6.023.873.95top 7% in Utah; top 4% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.791.170.69top 12% in Utah; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.313.393.50top 8% in Utah; top 4% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.980.880.48top 29% in Utah; top 6% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)26.750.745.8top 4% in Utah; top 9% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)14.340.642.9top 6% in Utah; top 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.05, RN 1.50, weekend 4.46.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.05 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for George E. Wahlen Ogden Veterans Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Government - State

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Avalon VA Management LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%05/31/2019
Avalon Veterans Services, L.L.C.Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%12/18/2018
Aston, AndreaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2013
Aston, AndreaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/28/2021
Avalon Health Care INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/09/2009
Avalon Health Care INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/09/2009
Avalon Health Care Management INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/03/2010
Avalon Health Care Management INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/17/2025
Bird, JillIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2025
Bird, JillIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2025
Borisevich, MariaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/08/2024
Borisevich, MariaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/08/2024
Borisevich, MariaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/08/2024
Dangerfield, DavidIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2007
Dangerfield, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2007
Hash, AlanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/15/2017
Hash, AlanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/15/2017
Hash, AlanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/15/2017
Kirton, ByronIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/27/2024
Kirton, ByronIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/27/2024

Showing 20 of 36 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 16 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Avalon Health Care — 16 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 15 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
  • "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
  • "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
  • "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
  • "Where do you post your daily staffing numbers, and can I see today's?"
  • "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 27% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 36 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 16 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC2.1 miOgden, UT★★★☆☆2/5
Harrison Pointe Healthcare and Rehabilitation6.1 miOgden, UT★★★★☆3/5
Crestwood Rehabilitation and Nursing6.4 miOgden, UT★★☆☆☆1/5
Stonehenge of Ogden6.9 miWashington Terrace, UT★★★★★4/5
Mt Ogden Health and Rehabilitation Center7.9 miWashington Terrace, UT★★★★★4/5
The Terrace Transitional7.9 miOgden, UT★★★☆☆2/5
Heritage Park Healthcare and Rehabilitation8.2 miRoy, UT★★★☆☆2/5abuse
South Ogden Post-Acute (cascades at South Ogden)8.5 miOgden, UT★★☆☆☆2/5
Mountain View Health Services9.1 miOgden, UT—/5SFF
Pine View Transitional Rehab9.4 miSouth Ogden, UT★★★★★5/5
Rocky Mountain Care- Clearfield12.7 miClearfield, UT★★☆☆☆1/5
Thatcher Brook Rehabilitation & Care Center13.4 miClearfield, UT★★★★★3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Ogden →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 465172.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details