How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Franklin-Simpson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
414 Robey Street, Franklin, KY 42135 (opens Google Maps) · Simpson County · (270) 586-7141· 98 certified beds · avg 84 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1992 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: BENJAMIN LANDA (48 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jul 3, 2025
2
Serious findings on record
most recent Feb 15, 2019
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.62
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 15, 2019 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 15, 2019 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 19, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 15, 2019 · F-0610
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 15, 2019 · F-0610
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Why it matters: When allegations aren't investigated, harm to residents can continue unchecked.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 19, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
View all 15 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| May 20, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| May 20, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 20, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs. · F-0800 |
| Feb 15, 2019 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Feb 15, 2019 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Feb 15, 2019 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 15, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Feb 15, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Feb 15, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to receive the visitors they choose, at the times they choose. · F-0563 |
| Feb 15, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 15, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 15, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
| Feb 15, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Feb 15, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 1).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 2
2021
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 11 | 2 | G ▲ |
| 2021 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityKentucky averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.62
Kentucky average: 3.71
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.47
Kentucky average: 0.74
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.25
Kentucky average: 3.27
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Kentucky avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.62 | 3.71 | 3.95 | bottom 4% in Kentucky; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.47 | 0.74 | 0.69 | bottom 24% in Kentucky; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.25 | 3.27 | 3.50 | bottom 3% in Kentucky; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.26 | 0.53 | 0.48 | bottom 18% in Kentucky; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.6 | 46.4 | 45.8 | bottom 32% in Kentucky; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 62.5 | 41.8 | 42.9 | bottom 15% in Kentucky; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.06, RN 0.54, weekend 2.63.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.06 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Franklin-Simpson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platschek, Alexander | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 15% | 09/01/2018 |
| Platschek, Goldie | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 25% | 09/01/2018 |
| Rubenstein, David | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 7% | 09/01/2018 |
| Blair, Amy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2024 |
| Blair, Amy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2024 |
| Cibc Bank USA | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2018 |
| Kelman, Moshe | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2018 |
| Medco Franklin Re, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2018 |
| Metropolitan Commercial Bank | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2018 |
| Muse, Gregory | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/14/2022 |
| Muse, Gregory | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/14/2022 |
| Raymer, Myra | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/10/2020 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Benjamin Landa — 48 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Hardinsburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Hardinsburg, KY · overall 3/5
- Henderson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Henderson, KY · overall 3/5
- Irvine Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Irvine, KY · overall 4/5
- Morganfield Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Morganfield, KY · overall 5/5
- River Haven Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Paducah, KY · overall 1/5
- Salyersville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Salyersville, KY · overall 1/5abuseSFF
- Shady Lawn Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Cadiz, KY · overall 5/5
- Stanton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Stanton, KY · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 47 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Can I see a sample menu, and how do you handle special diets like low-sodium or diabetic meals?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Kentucky midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 51% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hopkins Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 7.9 mi | Woodburn, KY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Auburn Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 12.8 mi | Auburn, KY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Signature Health of Portland Rehab & Wellness Cent | 14.6 mi | Portland, TN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Greenwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 16.1 mi | Bowling Green, KY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Magnolia Village Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 17.0 mi | Bowling Green, KY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Colonial Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 17.2 mi | Bowling Green, KY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Christian Health Center | 17.5 mi | Bowling Green, KY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| White House Health Care INC | 18.1 mi | White House, TN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Bowling Green Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 18.4 mi | Bowling Green, KY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Cal Turner Rehab and Specialty Care | 19.1 mi | Scottsville, KY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Creekwood Nursing & Rehabilitation | 19.1 mi | Russellville, KY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Signature Healthcare of Bowling Green | 19.7 mi | Bowling Green, KY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 185331.