KentuckyAuburn

Auburn Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

139 Pearl Street, Auburn, KY 42206 · Logan County · 66 certified beds · avg 63 residents/day · certified since Mar 30, 1967

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$24,850
Fines, last 3 years
2.86
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 7, 2026 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 7, 2026 · F-0678 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.

Why it matters: In a cardiac or breathing emergency, failure to start CPR promptly can be the difference between life and death.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (19)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 7, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Sep 12, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Sep 12, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Sep 12, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 12, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Apr 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Apr 22, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 22, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Jan 17, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 17, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Jan 17, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jan 17, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Jan 17, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jan 17, 2020C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202060E
202220D
202590F
202622J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $24,850.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 7, 2026Fine$12,425
Mar 7, 2026Fine$12,425

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKentucky avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.863.713.95bottom 13% in Kentucky; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.400.740.69bottom 14% in Kentucky; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.583.273.50bottom 17% in Kentucky; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.370.530.48bottom 35% in Kentucky; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)86.546.445.8bottom 1% in Kentucky; bottom 1% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)83.341.842.9bottom 2% in Kentucky; bottom 4% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.06, RN 0.43, weekend 2.77. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company · changed ownership in the last 12 months

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ky 2 HB Op LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/07/2025
Ab 139 Pearl Street Holdco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2025
Ab 139 Pearl Street LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2025
Auburn Fiscal LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2025
Auburn Opco Holdco LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2025
Brecher, HalIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2025
Carter, ValarieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/16/2026
Carter, ValarieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/16/2026
Frankel, SheftalIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2025
Frankel, SheftalIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2025
Hsieh, AnsonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2025
Hsieh, AnsonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2025
Kelman, MosheIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2025
Kelman, MosheIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2025
Kelman, MosheIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2025
Ky 2 Ao Op LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2025
Ky 2 Ao Prop LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2025
Ky 2 Ap Prop LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2025
Ky 2 Ft Op LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2025
Ky 2 Ft Prop LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Creekwood Nursing & Rehabilitation10.1 miRussellville, KY★★★★☆4/5
Hopkins Nursing and Rehabilitation Center10.2 miWoodburn, KY★★★★★4/5
Franklin-Simpson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center12.8 miFranklin, KY★★★☆☆4/5
Colonial Nursing and Rehabilitation Center15.1 miBowling Green, KY★★★★☆4/5
Christian Health Center15.9 miBowling Green, KY★★★★☆4/5
Magnolia Village Nursing and Rehabilitation Center15.9 miBowling Green, KY★★★★★5/5
Bowling Green Nursing and Rehabilitation Center16.8 miBowling Green, KY★★★★☆4/5
Greenwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center17.0 miBowling Green, KY★★☆☆☆2/5
Signature Healthcare of Bowling Green17.7 miBowling Green, KY★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Auburn →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 185049.