1930 South Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19145 (opens Google Maps) · Philadelphia County · (215) 709-4000· 53 certified beds · avg 47 residents/day · certified since Dec 27, 2016 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 4, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jan 20, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 14, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. F-0552
The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. F-0583
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552 |
| Feb 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Feb 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Feb 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Feb 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Feb 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Feb 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Apr 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Apr 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Apr 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · F-0947 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 6 | 2 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $12,735.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2026 | Fine | $12,735 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.32 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 1% in Pennsylvania; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.64 | 0.80 | 0.69 | bottom 48% in Pennsylvania; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.09 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 1% in Pennsylvania; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.29 | 0.56 | 0.48 | top 4% in Pennsylvania; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 42.7 | 44.5 | 45.8 | top 45% in Pennsylvania; top 44% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 21.1 | 39.9 | 42.9 | top 16% in Pennsylvania; top 16% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.71, RN 1.57, weekend 5.13.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.71 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Fox Subacute at South Philadelphia. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foulke, James | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/11/2015 |
| Murray, Joseph | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/11/2015 |
| Achss Office Ventures II, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/19/2021 |
| Bascou, Julie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/09/2020 |
| Bascou, Julie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/09/2020 |
| Dutka, Jalene | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/17/2020 |
| Fisher, Geni | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Fisher, Geni | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Fisher, Geni | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Fisher, Geni | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Fisher, Geni | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Foulke, James | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/11/2015 |
| Foulke, James | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/11/2015 |
| Foulke, James | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/11/2015 |
| Foulke, James | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/11/2015 |
| Foulke, James | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/11/2015 |
| Fox Subacute Management INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/14/2016 |
| Gillmore, Regina | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/22/2022 |
| Gillmore, Regina | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/22/2022 |
| Intelycare INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
Showing 20 of 35 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 15 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Monica Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare | 1.0 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Graduate Post Acute | 1.3 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Logan Square Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 2.3 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| University City Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ctr | 2.4 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Tucker House Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 2.7 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Renaissance Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 2.7 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Majestic Center for Rehab & Sub-Acute Care | 2.9 mi | Camden, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Holy Family Home | 3.0 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Rittenhouse Post Acute | 3.0 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Abigail House for Nursing & Rehabilitation | 3.2 mi | Camden, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| West Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 3.4 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Centennial Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 4.0 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Philadelphia, PA — 46 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 396141.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details