How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Focused Care at Westwood
8702 Course Drive, Houston, TX 77099 (opens Google Maps) · Harris County · (210) 705-4560· 125 certified beds · avg 99 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 2006 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS (25 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 14, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Dec 1, 2022
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.11
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 1, 2022 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 1, 2022 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 1, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 27 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint F-0695
The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint F-0690
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880
View all 27 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| Nov 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Nov 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Mar 14, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 14, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. · F-0813 |
| Mar 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Mar 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Mar 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint · F-0693 |
| Mar 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0697 |
| Mar 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Mar 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Mar 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Apr 11, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint · F-0644 |
| Jan 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jan 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jan 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 1, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 9).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2024
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 13
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 8 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 13 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityTexas averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.11
Texas average: 3.46
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.22
Texas average: 0.44
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.72
Texas average: 3.04
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.11 | 3.46 | 3.95 | bottom 31% in Texas; bottom 18% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.22 | 0.44 | 0.69 | bottom 11% in Texas; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.72 | 3.04 | 3.50 | bottom 31% in Texas; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.17 | 0.34 | 0.48 | bottom 13% in Texas; bottom 7% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 38.9 | 55.3 | 45.8 | top 18% in Texas; top 34% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 28.6 | 54.6 | 42.9 | top 15% in Texas; top 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.08, RN 0.22, weekend 2.69.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.08 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Focused Care at Westwood. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fpacp Houston LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/20/2019 |
| Bailey, Keisha | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/09/2024 |
| Bailey, Keisha | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/09/2024 |
| Carson, Sabrina | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/23/2022 |
| Conley, Shawn | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/07/2019 |
| Conley, Shawn | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/20/2019 |
| Focused Post Acute Care Partners LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/20/2019 |
| Focused Post Acute Care Partners LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2025 |
| Focused Post Acute Care Partners Management, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/20/2019 |
| Focused Post Acute Care Partners Management, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2025 |
| Fpacp Houston LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/20/2019 |
| McKenzie, Mark | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/07/2019 |
| McKenzie, Mark | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/20/2019 |
| Ngo, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/20/2019 |
| Ngo, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/20/2019 |
| Robinson-Cobbin, Robbie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/11/2024 |
| Robinson-Cobbin, Robbie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2025 |
| Strubbe, Loretta | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/07/2019 |
| Strubbe, Loretta | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/20/2019 |
All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Focused Post Acute Care Partners — 25 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Focused Care of Center — Center, TX · overall 3/5abuse
- Focused Care of Gilmer — Gilmer, TX · overall 1/5
- Focused Care of Waxahachie — Waxahachie, TX · overall 1/5abuse
- Focused Care at Allenbrook — Baytown, TX · overall 3/5
- Focused Care at Beechnut — Houston, TX · overall 2/5
- Focused Care at Burnet Bay — Baytown, TX · overall 2/5
- Focused Care at Cedar Bayou — Baytown, TX · overall 1/5
- Focused Care at Clarksville — Clarksville, TX · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 24 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What are your rules for bringing in my family member's favorite foods, and how are they stored?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Texas midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 39% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 19 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 75 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Houston Transitional Care | 2.2 mi | Houston, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Lev at Town Park | 2.5 mi | Houston, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Focused Care at Beechnut | 2.6 mi | Houston, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| West Houston Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 3.2 mi | Houston, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Clarewood House Extended Care Center | 3.5 mi | Houston, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Sharpview Residence and Rehabilitation Center | 3.5 mi | Houston, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Seven Acres Jewish Senior Care Services | 3.9 mi | Houston, TX | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Treemont Health Care Center | 4.5 mi | Houston, TX | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Ffiii Houston SNF Tenant LLC | 5.0 mi | Houston, TX | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Woodway Nursing & Rehab | 5.1 mi | Houston, TX | —/5 | SFF | |
| Avir at Houston | 5.5 mi | Houston, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Continuing Care at Eagles Trace | 5.5 mi | Houston, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Harris, TX — 97 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Garden Terrace Healthcare Center of Houston — Houston, TX · overall 2/5
- Harmony Care at Golfcrest — Houston, TX · overall 1/5
- Hca Houston Healthcare Southeast — Pasadena, TX · overall 5/5
- Heritage Park of Katy Nursing and Rehabilitation — Katy, TX · overall 3/5
- Highland Park Care Center — Houston, TX · overall 2/5
- Holly Hall — Houston, TX · overall 3/5
- Houston Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Houston, TX · overall 1/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676116.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).