TexasBaytown

Focused Care at Burnet Bay

3921 N Main, Baytown, TX 77521 · Harris County · 120 certified beds · avg 72 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 2000

Part of chain: FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS (25 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
5
Serious findings on record
$12,893
Fines, last 3 years
2.64
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 23, 2024 · F-0635 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not have doctor's orders in place for a resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.

Why it matters: Without admission orders, a new resident may miss critical medications or treatments during their first days.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 10, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 23, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 10, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 23, 2024 · F-0726 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.

Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 10, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 25, 2023 · F-0655 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.

Why it matters: In the critical first days, staff may not know a new resident's medications, diet, or fall risks.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Oct 12, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 25, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Oct 12, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 7, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Mar 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 23, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not have doctor's orders in place for a resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted. · from a complaint
Apr 23, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Apr 23, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give all staff the required training on its quality improvement program — the internal system for finding problems and making care better.
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop, carry out, or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or maintain an effective training program for its direct care staff, including training on how to communicate effectively with residents.
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate its staff on residents' rights and the facility's responsibilities toward residents. Staff can only respect rights they've been taught about.
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
Dec 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide its staff with required training on behavioral health — caring for residents with conditions like dementia, depression, or other mental health needs.
Sep 25, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
Sep 25, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023132J ▲
202433J ▲
202570E
202620E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $12,893.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 25, 2023Fine$12,893

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.643.463.95bottom 6% in Texas; bottom 5% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.360.440.69bottom 42% in Texas; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.433.043.50bottom 11% in Texas; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.290.340.48bottom 49% in Texas; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)30.055.345.8top 5% in Texas; top 14% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)14.354.642.9top 3% in Texas; top 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.90, RN 0.39, weekend 2.67. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Chambers County Public Hospital District No. 1OrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Abernathy, MaryIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Chambers County Public Hospital District No. 1OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Conley, ShawnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Conley, ShawnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Cooper, KimberlyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/29/2024
Cooper, KimberlyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/29/2024
Focused Post Acute Care Partners LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Focused Post Acute Care Partners LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/17/2025
Focused Post Acute Care Partners Management, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Focused Post Acute Care Partners Management, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/17/2025
Fpacp Burnet LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Fpacp Burnet LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/17/2025
Humphrey, EricIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Legg, StephenIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
McKenzie, MarkIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
McKenzie, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
McKenzie, MarkIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Newton, ElizabethIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE02/22/2024
Newton, ElizabethIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/22/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Focused Care at Allenbrook0.5 miBaytown, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Mont Belvieu Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center0.7 miMont Belvieu, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Rollingbrook Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center0.9 miBaytown, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Focused Care at Cedar Bayou1.2 miBaytown, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
St James House of Baytown3.9 miBaytown, TX★★★★★4/5
Bay Ridge Healthcare Center7.5 miLa Porte, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Sylan Shores Health and Wellness10.5 miLa Porte, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
East View Healthcare12.2 miHouston, TX★★★★★5/5
The Courtyards at Pasadena12.6 miPasadena, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Bridgecrest Rehabilitation Suites13.0 miHouston, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Baywood Crossing Rehabilitation & Healthcare Cente13.9 miPasadena, TX★★★★☆4/5
Focused Care at Pasadena14.8 miPasadena, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Baytown →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675849.