Focused Care at Hogan Park
3203 Sage St, Midland, TX 79705 · Midland County · 106 certified beds · avg 78 residents/day · certified since Mar 29, 2002
Part of chain: FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS (25 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$9,110
Fines, last 3 years
1.73
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 27, 2026 · F-0773 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them.
Why it matters: Delayed labs or unreported results can hold up a diagnosis and delay urgent treatment.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Mar 27, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (45)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them. · from a complaint |
| Nov 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint |
| Nov 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Nov 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Jan 16, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint |
| Jan 16, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' right to receive the visitors they choose, at the times they choose. |
| Jan 16, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. |
| Jan 16, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · from a complaint |
| Jan 16, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Oct 23, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint |
| Jul 19, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint |
| Dec 8, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · from a complaint |
| Dec 8, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · from a complaint |
| Dec 8, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| Dec 8, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Dec 8, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint |
| Dec 8, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · from a complaint |
| Dec 8, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint |
| Dec 8, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Dec 8, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Dec 8, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop or maintain an effective training program for its direct care staff, including training on how to communicate effectively with residents. · from a complaint |
| Dec 8, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not educate its staff on residents' rights and the facility's responsibilities toward residents. Staff can only respect rights they've been taught about. · from a complaint |
| Dec 8, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not include required infection control training — with written standards, policies, and procedures — as part of its infection prevention program. · from a complaint |
| Dec 8, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide its staff with training in compliance and ethics — teaching employees the laws and ethical standards that govern how residents must be treated. · from a complaint |
| Dec 8, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · from a complaint |
| Dec 8, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint |
| Dec 8, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint |
| Sep 28, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint |
| Sep 28, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint |
| Sep 28, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint |
| Sep 28, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint |
| Sep 28, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint |
| Sep 28, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint |
| Oct 20, 2022 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Oct 20, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Oct 20, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. |
| Oct 20, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs. |
| Oct 20, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. |
| Oct 20, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Oct 20, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. |
| Oct 20, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. |
| Oct 20, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. |
| Oct 20, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Oct 20, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (16 → 6).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 11 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 22 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $9,110.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2026 | Fine | $9,110 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 1.73 | 3.46 | 3.95 | bottom 1% in Texas; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.28 | 0.44 | 0.69 | bottom 23% in Texas; bottom 7% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 1.57 | 3.04 | 3.50 | bottom 1% in Texas; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.31 | 0.34 | 0.48 | top 44% in Texas; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 63.0 | 55.3 | 45.8 | bottom 28% in Texas; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 77.8 | 54.6 | 42.9 | bottom 22% in Texas; bottom 7% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.37, RN 0.38, weekend 2.15. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Who owns this facility
Government - Hospital district
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnold, Tanya | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2024 |
| Arnold, Tanya | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2024 |
| Bowerman, Stephen | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Bowerman, Stephen | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Chaplin, Cari | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2016 |
| Conley, Shawn | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2017 |
| Conley, Shawn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2017 |
| Flores, Thomas | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| Focused Post | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2017 |
| Focused Post | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/2025 |
| Focused Post Acute Care Partners II LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2017 |
| Focused Post Acute Care Partners II LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/2025 |
| Focused Post Acute Care Partners LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2017 |
| Focused Post Acute Care Partners LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/2025 |
| Focused Post Acute Care Partners Management, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2017 |
| Focused Post Acute Care Partners Management, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/2025 |
| Fpacp Hogan Park LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2017 |
| Fpacp Hogan Park LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/2025 |
| Goldapp, Shannon | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| Grametbaur, Carolyn | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "When a doctor orders lab work, how quickly is it done and how are results communicated back?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What are your visiting policies — can family visit any time the resident wants?"
- "How can my family member make private phone or video calls, and can we see where?"
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focused Care at Midland | 1.0 mi | Midland, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Midland Medical Lodge | 3.7 mi | Midland, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Mabee Health Care Center | 5.1 mi | Midland, TX | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Ashton Medical Lodge | 5.9 mi | Midland, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Parks Health Center | 15.4 mi | Odessa, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Deerings Nursing and Rehabilitation | 18.0 mi | Odessa, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Madison Medical Resort | 18.2 mi | Odessa, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Buena Vida Nursing & Rehab Odessa | 19.1 mi | Odessa, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675910.