TexasFort Stockton

Focused Care at Fort Stockton

501 N Sycamore, Fort Stockton, TX 79735 · Pecos County · 120 certified beds · avg 65 residents/day · certified since Sep 15, 1997

Part of chain: FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS (25 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.39
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Aug 11, 2023 · F-0580 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.

Why it matters: A family could learn about a serious injury or decline days later, after the chance to act has passed.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Aug 12, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Aug 11, 2023 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Aug 12, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Aug 11, 2023 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Aug 12, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (19)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Mar 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Mar 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Mar 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Nov 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Nov 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Nov 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jun 27, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Oct 5, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint
Oct 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Oct 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Aug 11, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Aug 11, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 11, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202363J ▲
202460E
202670E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.393.463.95bottom 2% in Texas; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.200.440.69bottom 7% in Texas; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.153.043.50bottom 3% in Texas; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.260.340.48bottom 40% in Texas; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)40.555.345.8top 21% in Texas; top 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.054.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.61, RN 0.22, weekend 2.35. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Government - Hospital district

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Midland County Hospital DistrictOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2017
Bongcawel, SteveIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/05/2024
Bongcawel, SteveIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/05/2024
Bowerman, StephenIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Bowerman, StephenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Chaplin, CariIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Conley, ShawnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2017
Conley, ShawnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2017
Flores, ThomasIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Focused PostOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2017
Focused PostOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/16/2025
Focused Post Acute Care Partners II LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2017
Focused Post Acute Care Partners II LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/15/2025
Focused Post Acute Care Partners LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2017
Focused Post Acute Care Partners LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/16/2025
Focused Post Acute Care Partners Management, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2017
Focused Post Acute Care Partners Management, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/16/2025
Fpacp Fort Stockton LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2017
Fpacp Fort Stockton LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/15/2025
Goldapp, ShannonIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

No other Medicare-certified nursing homes within 20 miles in the current records.

All facilities in Fort Stockton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675722.