How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Fairacres Manor, INC.
1700 18th Ave, Greeley, CO 80631 (opens Google Maps) · Weld County · (970) 353-3370· 116 certified beds · avg 106 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 1985 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: FRONTLINE MANAGEMENT (9 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 6, 2024
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Feb 13, 2020
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.80
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 13, 2020 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 13, 2020 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 13, 2020 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint F-0812
The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint F-0803
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
View all 17 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Jun 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint · F-0803 |
| Jun 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 13, 2020 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Feb 13, 2020 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 13, 2020 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 13, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Feb 13, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 13, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Feb 13, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Feb 13, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604 |
| Feb 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Feb 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Feb 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Feb 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Feb 21, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 3).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2020
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2024
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2020 | 8 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityColorado averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.80
Colorado average: 3.89
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.90
Colorado average: 0.86
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.46
Colorado average: 3.44
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Colorado avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.80 | 3.89 | 3.95 | top 46% in Colorado; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.69 | top 36% in Colorado; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.46 | 3.44 | 3.50 | top 39% in Colorado; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.48 | top 37% in Colorado; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 37.5 | 47.1 | 45.8 | top 25% in Colorado; top 30% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.0 | 44.6 | 42.9 | top 14% in Colorado; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.71, RN 0.88, weekend 3.38.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.71 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Fairacres Manor, INC.. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nelson, Jill | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 08/01/1996 |
| Baker, Adam | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Baker, Adam | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Bidell, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/1996 |
| Carriglitto, Matthew | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Cisneros, Suzanne | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2017 |
| Cisneros, Suzanne | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2017 |
| Continued Care LTC Pharmacy Colorado LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Cooper, Stephen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| Cooper, Stephen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| Dunn, James | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2017 |
| Dunn, James | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2017 |
| Frontier Management INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
| Frontier Management INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/28/2025 |
| Gilhooley, Rebecca | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/07/2006 |
| Gilhooley, Rebecca | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/07/2006 |
| Gilmer, Vicky | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2024 |
| Gilmer, Vicky | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2024 |
| Gonzales, Benjamin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Gonzales, Benjamin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
Showing 20 of 58 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 38 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Frontline Management — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Grace Manor Care Center — Burlington, CO · overall 5/5
- Peaks Care Center, the — Longmont, CO · overall 3/5
- Progressive Care Center — Canon City, CO · overall 2/5abuse
- Vista Ridge Care and Rehabilitation — Pueblo, CO · overall 3/5
- Garden Valley Retirement Village — Garden City, KS · overall 5/5
- Trinity Manor — Dodge City, KS · overall 4/5
- Wheatridge Park Care Center — Liberal, KS · overall 1/5
- Winfield Senior Living Community — Winfield, KS · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "What is your policy on physical restraints, and what alternatives do you try first?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 38% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 58 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broadview Health and Rehabilitation Center | 1.0 mi | Greeley, CO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Westlake Health and Rehabilitation Center | 1.1 mi | Greeley, CO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Center at Centerplace, LLC, the | 2.6 mi | Greeley, CO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Greeley | 2.8 mi | Greeley, CO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Grace Pointe Cont Care Sr Campus, Skilled Nursing | 4.2 mi | Greeley, CO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Pelican Pointe Health and Rehabilitation Center | 10.8 mi | Windsor, CO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Columbine Commons Health and Rehab LLC | 12.4 mi | Windsor, CO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Green House Homes at Mirasol, the | 18.5 mi | Loveland, CO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Good Samaritan - Loveland Village | 19.7 mi | Loveland, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Lemay Avenue Health and Rehab LLC | 19.8 mi | Fort Collins, CO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 065211.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).