How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1919 68th Ave, Greeley, CO 80634 (opens Google Maps) · Weld County · (970) 304-1919· 53 certified beds · avg 48 residents/day · certified since Nov 30, 2009 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 22, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 13, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 22, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Nov 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Aug 11, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 11, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Aug 11, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Aug 11, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Aug 11, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Aug 11, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (2 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Colorado avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.91 | 3.89 | 3.95 | top 12% in Colorado; top 15% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.13 | 0.86 | 0.69 | top 18% in Colorado; top 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.33 | 3.44 | 3.50 | top 13% in Colorado; top 15% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.85 | 0.61 | 0.48 | top 16% in Colorado; top 10% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 42.3 | 47.1 | 45.8 | top 34% in Colorado; top 42% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 31.6 | 44.6 | 42.9 | top 27% in Colorado; top 32% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.69, RN 1.08, weekend 4.14.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.69 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Grace Pointe Cont Care Sr Campus, Skilled Nursing. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Briscoe, Stephen | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 20% | 08/01/2021 |
| Mountain States Health Properties, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 09/14/2005 |
| WGCC, LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/18/2008 |
| Anderson, Shareen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2018 |
| Anderson, Shareen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2018 |
| Briscoe, Stephen | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/14/2005 |
| Briscoe, Stephen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/14/2009 |
| Briscoe, Stephen | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/08/2025 |
| Briscoe, Stephen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2009 |
| Continuum Health Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/11/1995 |
| Kadari, Rajendra | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/14/2009 |
| WGCC, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/14/2005 |
| WGCC, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/18/2008 |
All 13 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Center at Centerplace, LLC, the | 1.6 mi | Greeley, CO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Greeley | 1.8 mi | Greeley, CO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Westlake Health and Rehabilitation Center | 3.2 mi | Greeley, CO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Broadview Health and Rehabilitation Center | 3.9 mi | Greeley, CO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Fairacres Manor, INC. | 4.2 mi | Greeley, CO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Pelican Pointe Health and Rehabilitation Center | 7.3 mi | Windsor, CO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Columbine Commons Health and Rehab LLC | 8.9 mi | Windsor, CO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Green House Homes at Mirasol, the | 14.3 mi | Loveland, CO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Good Samaritan - Loveland Village | 15.5 mi | Loveland, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Riverbend Health and Rehabilitation Center | 15.8 mi | Loveland, CO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Lemay Avenue Health and Rehab LLC | 16.2 mi | Fort Collins, CO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| North Shore Health & Rehab Facility | 16.3 mi | Loveland, CO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 065397.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details