How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
2600 Northampton Street, Easton, PA 18045 (opens Google Maps) · Northampton County · (610) 250-0150· 227 certified beds · avg 198 residents/day · certified since Jul 19, 1982 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: GENESIS HEALTHCARE (184 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. F-0605
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jan 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Dec 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605 |
| Dec 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Dec 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Dec 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Dec 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 9, 2025 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Sep 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| May 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Nov 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Sep 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Mar 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint · F-0806 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Nov 20, 2023 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.01 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 12% in Pennsylvania; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.46 | 0.80 | 0.69 | bottom 18% in Pennsylvania; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.69 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 9% in Pennsylvania; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.27 | 0.56 | 0.48 | bottom 14% in Pennsylvania; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 45.9 | 44.5 | 45.8 | bottom 46% in Pennsylvania; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 40.0 | 39.9 | 42.9 | bottom 48% in Pennsylvania; top 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.21, RN 0.49, weekend 2.87.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.21 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Easton Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fc-Gen Operations Investment LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/14/2022 |
| Gen Operations I LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/14/2022 |
| Gen Operations II LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/14/2022 |
| Genesis Healthcare INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/14/2022 |
| Genesis Healthcare LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/14/2022 |
| Genesis Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/14/2022 |
| Genesis PM Pa Operations LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 11/14/2022 |
| GHC Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/14/2022 |
| Sun Healthcare Group INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/14/2022 |
| Aversa, Thaddeus | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/16/2025 |
| Aversa, Thaddeus | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/17/2025 |
| Berg, Michael | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/14/2022 |
| Bridgeford, Laura | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Mendelson, Avi | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2024 |
| Scott, Latifa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/18/2024 |
| Scott, Latifa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/17/2025 |
All 16 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Genesis Healthcare — 184 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 183 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Eastwood Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 0.7 mi | Easton, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Northampton Post Acute | 2.2 mi | Easton, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Gardens for Memory Care at Easton, the | 2.3 mi | Easton, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Gardens at Easton, the | 2.3 mi | Easton, PA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Country Meadows Nursing Center of Bethlehem | 3.5 mi | Bethlehem, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Complete Care at Phillipsburg, LLC | 4.4 mi | Phillipsburg, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Lopatcong Center | 4.8 mi | Phillipsburg, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Kirkland Village | 4.8 mi | Bethlehem, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Advanced Health Care of Hanover | 4.8 mi | Bethlehem, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Complete Care at Brakeley Park | 4.8 mi | Phillipsburg, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Moravian Hall Square Health and Wellness Center | 5.1 mi | Nazareth, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Northampton County-Gracedale | 5.4 mi | Nazareth, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Northampton, PA — 12 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395540.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details