How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
7700 Us Highway 158, Stokesdale, NC 27357 (opens Google Maps) · Guilford County · (336) 643-6301· 60 certified beds · avg 56 residents/day · certified since Jul 22, 1991 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 7 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jun 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint · F-0641 |
| May 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Apr 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Apr 18, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | North Carolina avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.11 | 4.01 | 3.95 | top 27% in North Carolina; top 35% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.44 | 0.64 | 0.69 | bottom 32% in North Carolina; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.77 | 3.56 | 3.50 | top 24% in North Carolina; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.24 | 0.41 | 0.48 | bottom 30% in North Carolina; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 46.9 | 49.0 | 45.8 | top 45% in North Carolina; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 45.7 | 42.9 | bottom 45% in North Carolina; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.92, RN 0.42, weekend 3.60.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.92 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Countryside. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
All 1 owning or managing party CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Piney Grove Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 9.1 mi | Kernersville, NC | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Jacob's Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 9.4 mi | Madison, NC | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Friends Homes at Guilford | 10.6 mi | Greensboro, NC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Summerstone Health and Rehabilitation Center | 10.9 mi | Kernersville, NC | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| North Carolina State Veterans Home Kernersville | 10.9 mi | Kernersville, NC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Walnut Cove Health and Rehabilitation | 11.0 mi | Walnut Cove, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Blumenthal Health and Rehabilitation Center | 11.0 mi | Greensboro, NC | —/5 | abuseSFF | |
| River Landing at Sandy Ridge | 12.1 mi | Colfax, NC | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Piedmont Hills Center for Nursing and Rehab | 12.9 mi | Greensboro, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Whitestone a Masonic and Eastern Star Community | 13.4 mi | Greensboro, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Camden Health and Rehabilitation | 13.4 mi | Greensboro, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Linden Place Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 13.9 mi | Greensboro, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Guilford, NC — 20 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345390.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details