CaliforniaLong Beach

Long Beach Post Acute

1201 Walnut Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90813 · Los Angeles County · 78 certified beds · avg 67 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1979

Part of chain: THE MANDELBAUM FAMILY (18 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.57
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
May 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint
May 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
May 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
May 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
May 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
May 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs. · from a complaint
May 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jan 15, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 3, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Oct 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
Oct 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Oct 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Oct 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Oct 6, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 6, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 6, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life.
Oct 6, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Oct 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Oct 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Oct 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380F
202470F
2026120E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.574.313.95top 26% in California; top 21% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.540.610.69top 40% in California; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.183.903.50top 24% in California; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.400.510.48top 45% in California; top 48% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)29.236.745.8top 27% in California; top 13% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)16.738.142.9top 13% in California; top 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.30, RN 0.51, weekend 3.94. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
MSSM LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/2023
Simcha and Janet Mandelbaum Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%09/01/2021
The Bentzion Mandelbaum 2021 Irrevocable Gift Trust No. 2Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest25%01/01/2023
The Janet Mandelbaum 2021 Irrevocable Gift Trust No 2Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%12/01/2021
The Simcha Mandelbaum 2021 Irrevocable Gift Trust No. 2Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest7%01/01/2023
1201 Walnut Avenue LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Albert, JenniferIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/09/2023
Albert, JenniferIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/09/2023
Castro-Garcia, MariaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/06/2019
Castro-Garcia, MariaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/06/2019
HansenOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Huang, JimmyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/20/2019
Huang, JimmyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/20/2019
Mandelbaum, BrendaIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2025
Mandelbaum, JanetIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Mandelbaum, JanetIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Mandelbaum, SimchaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2026
Merida, JasonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2023
Merida, JasonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2023
Monroy, AlejandroIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Colonial Care Center0.6 miLong Beach, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Villa Serena Healthcare Center0.6 miLong Beach, CA★★★★★4/5
Courtyard Care Center0.7 miSignal Hill, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Edgewater Skilled Nursing Center0.9 miLong Beach, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Pacific Palms Healthcare1.1 miLong Beach, CA★★☆☆☆1/5
Marlora Post Acute Rehab Hosp1.2 miLong Beach, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Coral Cove Post Acute1.2 miLong Beach, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Broadway by the Sea1.2 miLong Beach, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Ocean Ridge Post Acute1.3 miLong Beach, CA★★☆☆☆1/5
Alamitos Belmont Health and Rehabilitation1.3 miLong Beach, CA★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Long Beach →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555010.