Childrens HC Org No Ca Saratoga Pediatric Subacute
13425 Sousa Lane, Saratoga, CA 95070 · Santa Clara County · 37 certified beds · avg 31 residents/day · certified since Jul 15, 1985
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (18)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint |
| Feb 10, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Feb 10, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Feb 10, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Feb 10, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Mar 17, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Jul 23, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. |
| Jul 23, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jul 23, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jul 23, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. |
| Jul 23, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Jul 23, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jan 23, 2020 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jan 23, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. |
| Jan 23, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Jan 23, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Jan 23, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jan 23, 2020 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 0.00 | 4.31 | 3.95 | — |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.69 | — |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 0.00 | 3.90 | 3.50 | — |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.00 | 0.51 | 0.48 | — |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 0.0 | 36.7 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 38.1 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 0.00, RN 0.00, weekend 0.00. Staffing rating: —/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Innovations Health Systems LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 10/17/2016 |
| McGuire, Kenneth | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 50% | 10/17/2016 |
| Niccum, Dan | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 50% | 10/17/2016 |
| Barrett, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Barrett, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Dicarlo, Joseph | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Dicarlo, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| McGuire, Kenneth | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2019 |
| Stukov, Samuel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/03/2023 |
| Stukov, Samuel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/03/2023 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saratoga Retirement Community Health Center | 1.5 mi | Saratoga, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Westwood Post Acute | 1.6 mi | San Jose, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Villas at Saratoga Skilled Nsg & Assisted LVG | 2.0 mi | Saratoga, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Baywood Post Acute | 2.3 mi | Campbell, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Camden Postacute Care, INC | 2.7 mi | Campbell, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Childrens HC Org No Ca -Pediatric Hospital D/P SNF | 2.9 mi | Campbell, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Creekside Post-Acute | 3.0 mi | San Jose, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Plum Tree Care Center | 3.1 mi | San Jose, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Woodlands Healthcare Center | 3.1 mi | Los Gatos, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Stonebrook Health and Rehabilitation | 3.3 mi | Los Gatos, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555204.