CaliforniaCampbell

Childrens HC Org No Ca -Pediatric Hospital D/P SNF

3777 South Bascom Avenue, Campbell, CA 95008 · Santa Clara County · 27 certified beds · avg 27 residents/day · certified since Mar 3, 1999

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$3,145
Fines, last 3 years
0.00
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jul 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jul 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jul 8, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 8, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 8, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Oct 31, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Oct 31, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 31, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Oct 31, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Oct 31, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Oct 31, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Oct 31, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201970E
202230E
202460E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $3,145.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 2, 2023Fine$3,145

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)0.004.313.95
Registered Nurse hours0.000.610.69
Weekend total nurse staffing0.003.903.50
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.000.510.48
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.036.745.8
RN turnover (%)0.038.142.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 0.00, RN 0.00, weekend 0.00. Staffing rating: —/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Innovations Health Systems LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest01/01/2017
McGuire, KennethIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest01/01/2017
Niccum, DanIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest01/01/2017
Innovations Health Systems LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
McGuire, KennethIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
McGuire, KennethIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
McGuire, KennethIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
McGuire, KennethIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Niccum, DanIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Niccum, DanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Niccum, DanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Niccum, DanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Plum Tree Care Center0.5 miSan Jose, CA★★★★★4/5
Woodlands Healthcare Center0.6 miLos Gatos, CA★★★★★5/5
Camden Postacute Care, INC0.9 miCampbell, CA★★★★☆3/5
Stonebrook Health and Rehabilitation1.0 miLos Gatos, CA★★★★★4/5
Almaden Health and Rehabilitation Center1.6 miSan Jose, CA★★★★☆3/5
Baywood Post Acute1.7 miCampbell, CA★★★☆☆3/5
The Terraces of Los Gatos1.8 miLos Gatos, CA★★★★★5/5
Vasona Creek Healthcare Center2.3 miLos Gatos, CA★★☆☆☆3/5
Childrens HC Org No Ca Saratoga Pediatric Subacute2.9 miSaratoga, CA★★★★★4/5
Creekside Post-Acute2.9 miSan Jose, CA★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Campbell →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555734.