How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1301 Cottonwood Creek Trail, Cedar Park, TX 78613 (opens Google Maps) · Williamson County · (737) 757-3100· 122 certified beds · avg 111 residents/day · certified since Oct 10, 2017 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 4, 2024 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 5, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 9 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint F-0656
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. F-0677
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Jan 23, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Mar 4, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Aug 30, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 6 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.32 | 3.46 | 3.95 | top 49% in Texas; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.30 | 0.44 | 0.69 | bottom 28% in Texas; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.94 | 3.04 | 3.50 | top 47% in Texas; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.24 | 0.34 | 0.48 | bottom 35% in Texas; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 27.2 | 55.3 | 45.8 | top 4% in Texas; top 10% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 37.5 | 54.6 | 42.9 | top 26% in Texas; top 42% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.48, RN 0.31, weekend 3.08.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.48 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Cedar Pointe Health and Wellness Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - Hospital district
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple Springs Healthcare, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2023 |
| Apple Springs Healthcare, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/31/2025 |
| Baldwin, Shaun | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2023 |
| Baldwin, Shaun | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2023 |
| Baldwin, Shaun | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2023 |
| Burnam, Soon | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2023 |
| Caretrust GP LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2023 |
| Caretrust Reit INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2023 |
| Ctr Partnership LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2023 |
| Ensign Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/18/2021 |
| Hooper, Grady | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2023 |
| Keetch, Chad | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2011 |
| Philip, Anjana | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/27/2024 |
| Philip, Anjana | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/27/2024 |
| Philip, Anjana | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/27/2024 |
All 15 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Ensign Group — 342 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 341 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Springs Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 0.2 mi | Cedar Park, TX | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sagebrook Nursing and Rehabilitation | 1.1 mi | Cedar Park, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| New Hope Manor | 2.9 mi | Cedar Park, TX | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Center at Parmer | 4.3 mi | Austin, TX | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Park Valley Inn Health Center | 5.4 mi | Round Rock, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Ignite Medical Resort Round Rock, LLC | 5.5 mi | Austin, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Hearthstone Nursing and Rehabilitation | 5.9 mi | Round Rock, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Austin Wellness & Rehabilitation | 7.1 mi | Austin, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Trinity Care Center | 8.4 mi | Round Rock, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bel Air at Teravista | 8.5 mi | Round Rock, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Duval | 8.7 mi | Austin, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| San Gabriel Rehabilitation and Care Center | 9.3 mi | Round Rock, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Williamson, TX — 15 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676432.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details