TexasCedar Park

Sagebrook Nursing and Rehabilitation

901 Discovery Blvd, Cedar Park, TX 78613 · Williamson County · 124 certified beds · avg 93 residents/day · certified since Nov 5, 2002

Part of chain: CARADAY HEALTHCARE (8 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.93
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 14, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Dec 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Oct 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Mar 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs.
Mar 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Mar 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Mar 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Mar 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Aug 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Aug 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Jan 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202340E
2024150E
202520E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.933.463.95bottom 19% in Texas; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.410.440.69top 44% in Texas; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.713.043.50bottom 31% in Texas; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.320.340.48top 42% in Texas; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)50.755.345.8top 46% in Texas; bottom 35% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)41.754.642.9top 35% in Texas; top 50% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.19, RN 0.45, weekend 2.95. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Stratford Hospital DistrictOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%06/01/2020
Alcala, ChristopherIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/25/2023
Caraday Sagebrook LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2020
Choi, MaryannIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/04/2025
Choi, RobertIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/04/2025
Chumley, RichardIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2020
Cunningham, ErnestIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/04/2025
Granite Sagebrook Health Center, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2020
Granite Sagebrook Health Center, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2020
Krol, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Moore, GregoryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2020
O'Donoghue-Stallard, MaireIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/04/2025
Stallard, ThomasIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/04/2025
Wood, StephenIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/04/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Cedar Pointe Health and Wellness Center1.1 miCedar Park, TX★★★★☆4/5
The Springs Healthcare and Rehabilitation1.2 miCedar Park, TX★★★★☆3/5
New Hope Manor2.2 miCedar Park, TX★★★★☆3/5
The Center at Parmer4.8 miAustin, TX★★★★★4/5
Ignite Medical Resort Round Rock, LLC5.9 miAustin, TX★★☆☆☆1/5
Park Valley Inn Health Center6.0 miRound Rock, TX★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Hearthstone Nursing and Rehabilitation6.5 miRound Rock, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Austin Wellness & Rehabilitation6.6 miAustin, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Duval8.4 miAustin, TX★★★☆☆2/5
Trinity Care Center9.1 miRound Rock, TX★★★☆☆2/5
Bel Air at Teravista9.5 miRound Rock, TX★★★☆☆2/5
San Gabriel Rehabilitation and Care Center10.1 miRound Rock, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Cedar Park →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675937.