TexasCedar Park

The Springs Healthcare and Rehabilitation

1500 Cottonwood Creek Trail, Cedar Park, TX 78613 · Williamson County · 120 certified beds · avg 110 residents/day · certified since Nov 19, 2012

Part of chain: ML HEALTHCARE (6 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$21,258
Fines, last 3 years
2.75
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 12, 2023 · F-0635 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not have doctor's orders in place for a resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.

Why it matters: Without admission orders, a new resident may miss critical medications or treatments during their first days.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Nov 8, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 6, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 19, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 6, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 21, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Apr 21, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Apr 21, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Apr 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Apr 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jan 5, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 5, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Jan 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Jan 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Oct 12, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not have doctor's orders in place for a resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202311J ▲
2024110F
202530E
202691G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $21,258.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 6, 2026Fine$13,065
Oct 12, 2023Fine$8,193

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.753.463.95bottom 9% in Texas; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.330.440.69bottom 37% in Texas; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.493.043.50bottom 15% in Texas; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.340.340.48top 37% in Texas; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.455.345.8top 17% in Texas; top 32% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.354.642.9top 20% in Texas; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.12, RN 0.38, weekend 2.83. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Frio Hospital DistrictOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest04/01/2019
Krol, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Krol, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Langsdale, TroyIndividual5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Langsdale, TroyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Langsdale, TroyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Miller, LauraIndividual5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Miller, LauraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Miller, LauraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
ML Real Estate-Cedar Park, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
ML Real Estate-Cedar Park, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Ml-Cedar Park, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Ml-Cedar Park, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/26/2025
Ruff, MichaelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2021
Sondgeroth, ShannonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Cedar Pointe Health and Wellness Center0.2 miCedar Park, TX★★★★☆4/5
Sagebrook Nursing and Rehabilitation1.2 miCedar Park, TX★★★★☆4/5
New Hope Manor2.9 miCedar Park, TX★★★★☆3/5
The Center at Parmer4.5 miAustin, TX★★★★★4/5
Park Valley Inn Health Center5.5 miRound Rock, TX★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Ignite Medical Resort Round Rock, LLC5.7 miAustin, TX★★☆☆☆1/5
Hearthstone Nursing and Rehabilitation6.0 miRound Rock, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Austin Wellness & Rehabilitation7.3 miAustin, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Trinity Care Center8.5 miRound Rock, TX★★★☆☆2/5
Bel Air at Teravista8.5 miRound Rock, TX★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Cedar Park →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676327.