Brighton Post Acute Care

Name: Brighton Post Acute Care
Address: 170 COREY ROAD, Brighton, MA, 02135, US
Telephone: 6177310515

170 Corey Road, Brighton, MA 02135 · Suffolk County · 78 certified beds · avg 73 residents/day · certified since Apr 13, 2006

Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$200,070

Fines, last 3 years

3.34

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Nov 3, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Jan 5, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (31)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Nov 14, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule.
Nov 14, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Nov 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Nov 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Nov 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Nov 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Nov 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Nov 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 31, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 31, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 31, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Nov 3, 2023	▲ H · Actual harm, repeated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 3, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 3, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Nov 3, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 3, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Nov 3, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Nov 3, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Nov 3, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Nov 3, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Nov 3, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Nov 3, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 3, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Nov 3, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Nov 3, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults.
Nov 3, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Nov 3, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 3, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Nov 3, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Nov 3, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 9).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	19	1	H ▲
2024	3	0	E
2025	9	0	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $200,070.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Nov 3, 2023	Fine	$200,070

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Massachusetts avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.34	3.89	3.95	bottom 21% in Massachusetts; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.86	0.65	0.69	top 15% in Massachusetts; top 23% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.69	3.51	3.50	bottom 8% in Massachusetts; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.40	0.46	0.48	bottom 46% in Massachusetts; top 48% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	52.9	38.2	45.8	bottom 13% in Massachusetts; bottom 30% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	86.7	42.6	42.9	bottom 2% in Massachusetts; bottom 3% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.74, RN 0.97, weekend 3.00. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Kahanow, Aviva	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	09/03/2025
Rokeach, Fraide	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	09/03/2025
Alghazawneh, Bashar	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	01/07/2026
Alghazawneh, Bashar	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/07/2026
Alghazawneh, Bashar	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/07/2026
Brighton Real Property LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/03/2025
Cohen, David	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	09/29/2025
Cohen, David	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/29/2025
Flagler, Osher	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/05/2025
Israel Discount Bank of New York - Idb Bank of York	Organization	5% or Greater Security Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	09/03/2025
Levovitz, Tzvi	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/05/2025
Marquis Limited LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/03/2025
Marquis Limited LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/05/2025
NFR 2020 Irrv Tr	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/03/2025
Posen, Mindee	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/03/2025
Quinto Nexgen LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/03/2025
Reliant Pro Rehab LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/29/2025
Reliant Pro Rehab LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/16/2025
Rokowsky, Yitzchok	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/05/2025
Rsbrmk Holdings LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/03/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"How often does the attending doctor physically see each resident, and how is that documented?"
"How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
"Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
"How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
"How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Spaulding Nursing and Therapy Center - Brighton	0.8 mi	Boston, MA	★★★★★	5/5
Care One at Brookline	0.8 mi	Brookline, MA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Presentation Rehab and Skilled Care Center	1.7 mi	Boston, MA	★★★★☆	3/5
Sherrill House	1.8 mi	Boston, MA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Watertown Rehabilitation and Nursing Center	1.8 mi	Watertown, MA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Benjamin Healthcare Center	2.1 mi	Boston, MA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Armenian Nursing & Rehabilitation Center	2.4 mi	Boston, MA	★★★☆☆	4/5
Cambridge Rehabilitation & Nursing Center	2.4 mi	Cambridge, MA	★★★★☆	4/5
Laurel Ridge Rehab and Skilled Care Center	3.1 mi	Boston, MA	★★★★★	4/5
Recuperative Services Unit-Hebrew Rehab Center	3.2 mi	Boston, MA	★★★★★	4/5
Neville Center at Fresh Pond for Nursing & Rehab	3.2 mi	Cambridge, MA	★★★★☆	4/5
Sancta Maria Nursing Facility	3.4 mi	Cambridge, MA	★★☆☆☆	2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Brighton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225770.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Brighton Post Acute Care

170 Corey Road, Brighton, MA 02135 · 6177310515

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $200,070

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Nov 3, 2023 (F-0689, Actual harm, repeated): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "How often does the attending doctor physically see each resident, and how is that documented?"
☐ "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
☐ "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
☐ "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 225770 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)