KentuckyFlorence

Belmont Terrace Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

7300 Woodspoint Drive, Florence, KY 41042 · Boone County · 151 certified beds · avg 128 residents/day · certified since Dec 9, 1969

Part of chain: ENCORE HEALTH PARTNERS (12 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
8
Serious findings on record
$35,980
Fines, last 3 years
2.94
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 14, 2021 · F-0580

The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.

Why it matters: A family could learn about a serious injury or decline days later, after the chance to act has passed.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 24, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 14, 2021 · F-0656

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 24, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 14, 2021 · F-0657

The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.

Why it matters: Delays or gaps in care planning mean staff may work without a clear, current roadmap for the resident's daily care and treatment.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 24, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 14, 2021 · F-0661

When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.

Why it matters: Missing handoff information — like current medications and conditions — is a common cause of dangerous errors after discharge.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 24, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 14, 2021 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 24, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 14, 2021 · F-0695

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Why it matters: Mistakes in breathing care can quickly become life-threatening for residents who depend on oxygen or equipment.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 24, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Mar 8, 2024 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Apr 30, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 8, 2024 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 30, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (54)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 24, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Apr 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint
Mar 8, 2024▲ H · Actual harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Mar 8, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Mar 8, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Mar 8, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 8, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Mar 8, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Mar 8, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Mar 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Mar 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Mar 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Mar 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Mar 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Mar 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Mar 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Mar 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from being involuntarily separated — kept apart from other residents, kept out of their own room, or confined to their room. Isolating a resident this way is a form of mistreatment.
Mar 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Mar 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Mar 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Mar 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Mar 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Mar 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Mar 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
Mar 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint
Mar 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Mar 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
May 14, 2021▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
May 14, 2021▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 14, 2021▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 14, 2021▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
May 14, 2021▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 14, 2021▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 14, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
May 14, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 14, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 14, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
May 14, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
May 14, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
May 14, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
May 14, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 14, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds.
May 14, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 14, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
May 14, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (32 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2021186J ▲
2024322H ▲
202540F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

6 fines totaling $35,980, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 8, 2024Fine$5,346
Mar 8, 2024Fine$6,682
Mar 8, 2024Fine$16,801
Mar 8, 2024Payment Denial59 days from Apr 7, 2024
Jan 8, 2024Fine$2,258
Jan 2, 2024Fine$1,748
Dec 11, 2023Fine$3,145

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKentucky avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.943.713.95bottom 16% in Kentucky; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.270.740.69bottom 2% in Kentucky; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.723.273.50bottom 27% in Kentucky; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.190.530.48bottom 8% in Kentucky; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)59.146.445.8bottom 13% in Kentucky; bottom 18% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)72.241.842.9bottom 8% in Kentucky; bottom 10% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.75, RN 0.34, weekend 3.47. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Encore Investors 2 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/20/2023
Encore Investors LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/20/2023
Encore Parent Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%10/20/2023
Grinspan, EliIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/20/2023
Grinspan, IsaacIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/20/2023
Rubenstein, DavidIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/20/2023
7300 Woodspoint Drive Realty LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/20/2023
7300 Woodspoint Drive Realty LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/20/2023
Balt M4 LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/20/2023
Bloom, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/20/2023
Dwight Mortgage Trust LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/05/2025
Encore Health Partners 2 LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/20/2023
Encore Health Partners 2 LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2025
Encore Realty 2 LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/20/2023
Fischel, MayerIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/20/2023
Fischel, MayerIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/20/2023
Fischel, MayerIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/20/2023
Gefner Family Holding LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/20/2023
Graves, KennethIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/20/2023
Graves, KennethIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/20/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Florence Park Care Center0.7 miFlorence, KY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Villaspring of Erlanger1.6 miErlanger, KY★★★☆☆2/5
Village Care Center3.0 miErlanger, KY★★★★☆4/5
Emerald Trace3.3 miElsmere, KY★★☆☆☆2/5
Woodcrest Nursing and Rehabilitation Center3.4 miElsmere, KY★★★★☆4/5
St Elizabeth Edgewood SNF4.2 miEdgewood, KY★★★★★4/5
Madonna Manor5.2 miVilla Hills, KY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Brookside Healthcare Center6.0 miCincinnati, OH★★★★★4/5
Bayley Place6.1 miCincinnati, OH★★★★★4/5
Delhi Post-Acute6.5 miCincinnati, OH★☆☆☆☆2/5
Boonespring Transitional Care Center, LLC6.9 miUnion, KY★★★★☆4/5
Western Hills Retirement Village7.7 miCincinnati, OH★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Florence →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 185090.