OhioCincinnati

Bayley Place

990 Bayley Place Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45233 · Hamilton County · 110 certified beds · avg 102 residents/day · certified since Dec 21, 1990

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
6.67
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Aug 21, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Aug 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Aug 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Aug 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them.
Aug 21, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Aug 12, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 12, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Aug 12, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Aug 12, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Aug 12, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Aug 12, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 12, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Aug 12, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jul 18, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Jul 18, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Jul 18, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Jul 18, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201940D
202280F
202560F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOhio avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)6.673.453.95top 1% in Ohio; top 2% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.540.600.69bottom 49% in Ohio; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing6.323.073.50top 1% in Ohio; top 1% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.380.420.48bottom 48% in Ohio; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)49.748.745.8bottom 47% in Ohio; bottom 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)63.243.942.9bottom 20% in Ohio; bottom 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 6.80, RN 0.55, weekend 6.44. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Christian, RonaldIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Coury, WilliamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/07/2024
Coury, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/07/2024
Coury, WilliamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/07/2024
Gick, LisaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Goettke, LoisIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Gumbert, DianeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Gumbert, DianeIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Gumbert, DianeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Klink, HaroldIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2009
Kocsis, PaulIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2005
Kocsis, PaulIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2005
Kocsis, PaulIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2005
Konrad, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2014
Lind, JosephIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Massa, ScottIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2005
Massa, ScottIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2005
Ryan, KenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Sabourin, PatriciaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2012
Sedler, ThomasIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Delhi Post-Acute0.5 miCincinnati, OH★☆☆☆☆2/5
Western Hills Retirement Village1.7 miCincinnati, OH★★★★☆3/5
Aventura at West Park3.2 miCincinnati, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Brookside Healthcare Center3.2 miCincinnati, OH★★★★★4/5
Edith Lane of Cincinnati3.7 miCincinnati, OH★★☆☆☆1/5
Madonna Manor3.8 miVilla Hills, KY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Ivy Woods Healthcare Center.4.1 miCincinnati, OH★★★★☆3/5
Hillebrand Nursing and Rehabilitation Center4.3 miCincinnati, OH★★☆☆☆2/5
Bridgetown Nursing and Rehabilitation Centre4.3 miCheviot, OH★★☆☆☆2/5
Harrison Pavilion Care Center4.5 miCincinnati, OH★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Cincinnati →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365818.