Aberdeen Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Center

Name: Aberdeen Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Center
Address: 5500 Fort St, Trenton, MI, 48183, US
Telephone: 7346713500

5500 Fort St, Trenton, MI 48183 · Wayne County · 120 certified beds · avg 47 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1978

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.74

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (36)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 9, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 11, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 11, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility employed staff who were not licensed, certified, or registered as required by state law.
Sep 11, 2025	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Sep 11, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Sep 11, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 11, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jul 17, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Jul 17, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Aug 29, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 11, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Aug 9, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Aug 9, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 9, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Aug 9, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Aug 9, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Aug 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Aug 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Aug 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Aug 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Aug 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Aug 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Aug 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Aug 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Aug 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Aug 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Aug 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Aug 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Aug 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Aug 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Aug 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Aug 9, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.
Aug 9, 2023	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 6).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2023	24	E
2024	3	D
2025	8	F
2026	1	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Michigan avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.74	4.32	3.95	bottom 23% in Michigan; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.33	0.84	0.69	bottom 6% in Michigan; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.46	3.79	3.50	bottom 38% in Michigan; top 44% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.25	0.49	0.48	bottom 18% in Michigan; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	68.2	44.1	45.8	bottom 2% in Michigan; bottom 7% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	66.7	39.2	42.9	bottom 10% in Michigan; bottom 15% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.42, RN 0.30, weekend 3.17. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Individual

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Nasir, Iqbal	Individual	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2008
Nasir, Shahida	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	50%	07/01/2008
Duggan, Dennis	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2024
Duggan, Dennis	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2024
Nasir, Iqbal	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2008
Nasir, Iqbal	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2008
Nasir, Shahida	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2008
Sudhakara, Avikshitha	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2022
Sudhakara, Avikshitha	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/25/2025
Terry, Michelle	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/10/2011

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"How do you verify licenses and certifications for every caregiver before they start, and how often do you recheck them?"
"How do you inspect and maintain essential equipment, and how quickly are repairs made?"
"How do you make sure resident assessments are completed and submitted to the state on time?"
"Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
"What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
"Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Applewood Nursing Center, INC	0.8 mi	Woodhaven, MI	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Aerius Health Center	3.0 mi	Riverview, MI	★★★★★	5/5
Rivergate Terrace	4.8 mi	Riverview, MI	★★★☆☆	3/5
Rivergate Health Care Center	4.8 mi	Riverview, MI	★★★★☆	4/5
Belle Fountain Nursing & Rehabilitation Center	4.9 mi	Riverview, MI	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
The Orchards at Southgate	5.7 mi	Southgate, MI	★★★★★	4/5
The Lodge at Taylor	7.1 mi	Taylor, MI	★★★☆☆	3/5
Medilodge of Taylor	7.1 mi	Taylor, MI	★★★☆☆	2/5
Regency, a Villa Center	7.4 mi	Taylor, MI	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Allen Park	8.8 mi	Allen Park, MI	★★★☆☆	3/5
Imperial, a Villa Center	11.7 mi	Dearborn Heights, MI	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Riverside Commons Rehab and Nursing Center, LLC	12.9 mi	Dearborn, MI	★★★☆☆	2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Trenton →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235052.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Aberdeen Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Center

5500 Fort St, Trenton, MI 48183 · 7346713500

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 2/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "How do you verify licenses and certifications for every caregiver before they start, and how often do you recheck them?"
☐ "How do you inspect and maintain essential equipment, and how quickly are repairs made?"
☐ "How do you make sure resident assessments are completed and submitted to the state on time?"
☐ "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
☐ "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 235052 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)