Bradley Court

675 E Bradley, El Cajon, CA 92021 (opens Google Maps) · San Diego County · (619) 448-6633· 56 certified beds · avg 55 residents/day · certified since Sep 30, 1990 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE (27 facilities, chain avg rating 4.1★)

5/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Mar 13, 2025

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

5.33

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Mar 13, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
Mar 13, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. F-0759
Mar 13, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761

View all 19 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Mar 13, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Mar 13, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759
Mar 13, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Mar 13, 2025	B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern	The facility had resident rooms holding more people than allowed — no more than 4 residents per room, and no more than 2 per room in buildings constructed after November 28, 2016. · F-0911
Mar 13, 2025	B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern	The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912
Nov 7, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
May 17, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
May 17, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
May 17, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not notify the appropriate authorities when a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability had a significant change in condition. · F-0646
May 17, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
May 17, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699
May 17, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
May 17, 2024	B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern	The facility had resident rooms holding more people than allowed — no more than 4 residents per room, and no more than 2 per room in buildings constructed after November 28, 2016. · F-0911
May 17, 2024	B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern	The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912
Jun 16, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
Jun 16, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Jun 16, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Jun 16, 2023	B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern	The facility had resident rooms holding more people than allowed — no more than 4 residents per room, and no more than 2 per room in buildings constructed after November 28, 2016. · F-0911
Jun 16, 2023	B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern	The facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms. · F-0912

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 5).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2023

2024

2025

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2023	5	D
2024	9	E
2025	5	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityCalifornia averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

5.33

4.31

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

1.02

0.61

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

4.77

3.90

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	5.33	4.31	3.95	top 10% in California; top 9% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	1.02	0.61	0.69	top 11% in California; top 15% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.77	3.90	3.50	top 9% in California; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.54	0.51	0.48	top 27% in California; top 28% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	13.5	36.7	45.8	top 2% in California; top 1% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	44.4	38.1	42.9	bottom 36% in California; bottom 45% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.16, RN 0.60, weekend 2.83.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.16 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Bradley Court. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Bmo Bank National Association	Organization	5% or Greater Security Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	09/20/2023
Mastrocola, Lois	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Mastrocola, Lois	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Mastrocola, Lois	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Olds, Thomas	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020
Olds, Thomas	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2020

All 6 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Generations Healthcare — 27 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Canyon Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Canoga Park, CA · overall 3/5
Castle Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — National City, CA · overall 4/5
Cedar Crest Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Sunnyvale, CA · overall 4/5
English Oaks Convalescent & Rehabilitation Hospita — Modesto, CA · overall 3/5
Friendship Manor Nursing & Rehab Center — National City, CA · overall 5/5
Gramercy Court — Sacramento, CA · overall 4/5abuse
Heritage Park Nursing Center — Upland, CA · overall 5/5
Horizon Health & Subacute Center — Fresno, CA · overall 2/5

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 26 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"How many residents share each room, and what options are there for more privacy?"
"Can I see the actual room my family member would live in before we decide?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 14% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 62 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Cottonwood Canyon Healthcare Center	1.8 mi	El Cajon, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Granite Hills Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LLC	1.8 mi	El Cajon, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
The Royal Home	1.8 mi	El Cajon, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
Somerset Post Acute Care	1.8 mi	El Cajon, CA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Country Hills Post Acute	1.9 mi	El Cajon, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Villa Las Palmas Healthcare Center	2.0 mi	El Cajon, CA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Stanford Court Skilled Nursing & Rehab Center	2.1 mi	Santee, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Victoria Post Acute Care	2.1 mi	El Cajon, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Parkside Health and Wellness Center	2.2 mi	El Cajon, CA	★★★★★	5/5
Magnolia Post Acute Care	2.2 mi	El Cajon, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
Stillwater Post-Acute	2.3 mi	El Cajon, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Lakeside Special Care Center	2.8 mi	Lakeside, CA	★★★★★	5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in San Diego, CA — 83 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Brighton Place San Diego — San Diego, CA · overall 1/5
Brighton Place Spring Valley — Spring Valley, CA · overall 2/5
Carlsbad by the Sea — Carlsbad, CA · overall 5/5
Carmel Mountain Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center — San Diego, CA · overall 3/5
Casa de Las Campanas — San Diego, CA · overall 2/5
Castle Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — National City, CA · overall 4/5
Community Care Center — La Mesa, CA · overall 4/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in El Cajon →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555140.