FloridaLeesburg

Avante at Leesburg, INC

2000 Edgewood Ave, Leesburg, FL 34748 · Lake County · 116 certified beds · avg 109 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1980

Part of chain: AVANTE CENTERS (11 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.74
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 23, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jun 23, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Apr 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Apr 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Apr 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.
Apr 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Apr 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 31, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jan 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 4, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 4, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Aug 4, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Aug 4, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 4, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Aug 4, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 4, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202270F
202440E
2025100E
202620E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.744.033.95bottom 36% in Florida; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.450.760.69bottom 16% in Florida; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.813.683.50top 28% in Florida; top 29% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.480.530.48top 45% in Florida; top 36% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)62.641.445.8bottom 6% in Florida; bottom 13% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)77.846.042.9bottom 6% in Florida; bottom 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.50, RN 0.42, weekend 3.57. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ag Holdings, INC.Organization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%10/22/1990
Debbie Klurman 1994 TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%06/20/1989
Deena Klurman Kranz 2000 TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%06/20/1989
Mona Mizrachi 1994 TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest8%06/20/1989
Sisel Klurman 2001 Revocable TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest25%04/09/2010
Biegasiewicz, KimberlyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/04/2022
Biegasiewicz, KimberlyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/04/2022
Biegasiewicz, KimberlyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/04/2022
Chopra, ShawnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/31/2025
Hornack, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2019
Newmones, JaquanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/31/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
North Campus Rehabilitation and Nursing Center1.4 miLeesburg, FL★★★★☆3/5
South Campus Care Center and Rehab1.6 miLeesburg, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Lake Port Square Health Center2.1 miLeesburg, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Chatham Glen Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center7.7 miThe Villages, FL★★★★★4/5
Villages Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center, the7.8 miLady Lake, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Cypress Care Center9.2 miWildwood, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Lady Lake Specialty Care Center and Rehab9.4 miLady Lake, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Freedom Pointe Health Center10.6 miThe Villages, FL★★★★☆4/5
Solaris Healthcare Waterman11.3 miTavares, FL★★★★★4/5
Buffalo Crossings Healthcare & Rehabilitation Cen11.6 miThe Villages, FL★★★★★4/5
Ruleme Center12.5 miEustis, FL★★★★☆3/5
Lake Eustis Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center12.7 miEustis, FL★★☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Leesburg →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105304.