How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Anchor Care and Rehabilitation Center
3325 Highway 35, Hazlet, NJ 07730 (opens Google Maps) · Monmouth County · (732) 264-5800· 170 certified beds · avg 150 residents/day · certified since Jan 29, 1992 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: EXCELSIOR CARE GROUP (33 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 19, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.28
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. F-0690
View all 18 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jun 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jun 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jun 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Jun 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 5, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Oct 12, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training. · from a complaint · F-0728 |
| Mar 17, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Mar 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| May 21, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. · F-0808 |
| May 21, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 21, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| May 21, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| May 21, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| May 21, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 21, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 6).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew Jersey averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.28
New Jersey average: 3.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.58
New Jersey average: 0.67
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.00
New Jersey average: 3.53
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.28 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 22% in New Jersey; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.58 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 47% in New Jersey; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.00 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 25% in New Jersey; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.31 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 32% in New Jersey; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.3 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 23% in New Jersey; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 21.1 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 18% in New Jersey; top 16% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.32, RN 0.59, weekend 3.04.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.32 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Anchor Care and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkowitz, Cheskel | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 12% | 01/01/2025 |
| Berkowitz, Sam | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 65% | 01/01/2025 |
| Leifer, Joel | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 12% | 01/01/2025 |
| Zupnick, Joel | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 12% | 01/01/2025 |
| Awan, Omar | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2024 |
| Awan, Omar | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2024 |
| Berkowitz, Cheskel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Berkowitz, Sam | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Berkowitz, Sam | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Excelsior Care Group | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/12/2019 |
| Excelsior Care Group | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/26/2025 |
| Leifer, Joel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Sevilleno, Beverly | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/22/2008 |
| Sevilleno, Beverly | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/22/2008 |
| Steinberg, Moshe | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/12/2019 |
| Steinberg, Moshe | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/12/2019 |
| Stern, Samuel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/12/2019 |
| Stern, Samuel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/12/2019 |
| Willner, Benzion | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/26/2025 |
| Willner, Benzion | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/26/2025 |
Showing 20 of 21 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 1 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Excelsior Care Group — 33 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Arnold Walter Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Hazlet, NJ · overall 3/5
- River Front Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Pennsauken, NJ · overall 1/5
- Atrium Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing — Brooklyn, NY · overall 4/5
- Briarcliff Manor Center for Rehab and Nursing Care — Briarcliff Manor, NY · overall 1/5
- Cypress Garden Center for Nursing and Rehabilitati — Flushing, NY · overall 5/5
- Nassau Rehabilitation & Nursing Center — Hempstead, NY · overall 3/5
- Seagate Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Brooklyn, NY · overall 2/5abuse
- Staten Island Care Center — Staten Island, NY · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 32 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "How do you coordinate and monitor care for residents who receive dialysis?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "What training and competency checks do your nurse aides go through, and how do you keep their skills current?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New Jersey midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 50% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 21 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 105 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete Care at Bayshore LLC | 0.9 mi | Holmdel, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Arnold Walter Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 2.5 mi | Hazlet, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Meadowbrook Respiratory and Nursing Center | 2.9 mi | Matawan, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Complete Care at Madison, LLC | 3.1 mi | Matawan, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Laurel Bay Health & Rehabilitation Center | 3.1 mi | Keansburg, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Careone at Holmdel | 3.6 mi | Holmdel, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Venetian Care & Rehabilitation Center, LLC | 5.8 mi | South Amboy, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| De la Salle Hall | 6.7 mi | Lincroft, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Preferred Care at Old Bridge, LLC | 7.2 mi | Old Bridge, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Alameda Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 7.5 mi | Perth Amboy, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Careone at Middletown | 7.6 mi | Atlantic Highlands, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Roosevelt Care Center at Old Bridge | 7.8 mi | Old Bridge, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Monmouth, NJ — 32 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Applewood Village, INC — Freehold, NJ · overall 5/5
- Aster Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Tinton Falls, NJ · overall 3/5
- Atrium at Navesink Harbor, the — Red Bank, NJ · overall 2/5
- Careone at Wall — Wall, NJ · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315314.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).