How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Advanced Health Care of Aurora
1800 S Potomac St, Aurora, CO 80012 (opens Google Maps) · Arapahoe County · (720) 213-1700· 54 certified beds · avg 51 residents/day · certified since Dec 20, 2007 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ADVANCED HEALTH CARE (26 facilities, chain avg rating 4.8★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Oct 24, 2024
1
Serious findings on record
most recent May 9, 2023
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.65
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 9, 2023 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 9, 2023 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 26, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 7 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint F-0761
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
View all 7 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Oct 24, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 9, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| May 9, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 27, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 3).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2024
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 2 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityColorado averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.65
Colorado average: 3.89
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.90
Colorado average: 0.86
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.26
Colorado average: 3.44
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Colorado avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.65 | 3.89 | 3.95 | bottom 46% in Colorado; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.69 | top 37% in Colorado; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.26 | 3.44 | 3.50 | bottom 47% in Colorado; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.36 | 0.61 | 0.48 | top 3% in Colorado; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 31.0 | 47.1 | 45.8 | top 12% in Colorado; top 16% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 30.8 | 44.6 | 42.9 | top 22% in Colorado; top 30% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.95, RN 1.22, weekend 4.43.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.95 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Advanced Health Care of Aurora. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Ahc Holdings, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/2021 |
| The Bryan Miller Utah Dynasty Trust Dated April 22, 2014 | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| The Gail Miller GST Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 72% | 01/01/2024 |
| Himes, Cassidy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/19/2025 |
| Himes, Cassidy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/09/2025 |
| Karimova, Nodira | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/09/2025 |
| LHMSH LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| New Ahc Holdings, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/02/2025 |
| Oxnam, Nathan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| S&S Nutrition Network INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
All 10 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Advanced Health Care — 26 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Advanced Health Care of Colorado Springs — Colorado Springs, CO · overall 5/5
- Ahc of Lakewood, LLC — Lakewood, CO · overall 5/5
- Advanced Health Care of Coeur D'alene — Coeur D'alene, ID · overall 5/5
- Aspen Transitional Rehabilitation — Meridian, ID · overall 3/5abuse
- Advanced Health Care of Overland Park — Overland Park, KS · overall 5/5
- Advanced Health Care of Albuquerque — Albuquerque, NM · overall 5/5
- Advanced Health Care of Henderson — Las Vegas, NV · overall 5/5
- Advanced Health Care of Las Vegas — Las Vegas, NV · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 25 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Colorado midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 31% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 81 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garden Terrace Alzheimer's Center of Excellence | 0.3 mi | Aurora, CO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Aurora | 0.6 mi | Aurora, CO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Springs at St. Andrews Village | 1.0 mi | Aurora, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Hampden Hills Post Acute | 2.1 mi | Aurora, CO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| University Heights Care Center | 3.1 mi | Aurora, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Lowry Hills Care and Rehabilitation | 3.3 mi | Aurora, CO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Highland Park Rehabilitation & Care Center | 3.5 mi | Aurora, CO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Center at Lowry, LLC | 4.1 mi | Denver, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Beth Israel at Shalom Park | 4.2 mi | Aurora, CO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Veterans Community Living Center at Fitzsimons | 4.3 mi | Aurora, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Crestmoor Care Center | 4.4 mi | Denver, CO | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Berkley Manor Care Center | 4.5 mi | Denver, CO | ★★★★★ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Arapahoe, CO — 19 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Brookdale Greenwood Village — Greenwood Village, CO · overall 3/5
- Cherrelyn Healthcare Center — Littleton, CO · overall 4/5
- Englewood Post Acute and Rehabilitation — Englewood, CO · overall 4/5
- Julia Temple Healthcare Center — Englewood, CO · overall 3/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 065393.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).