ColoradoDenver

Crestmoor Care Center

895 S Monaco Pkwy, Denver, CO 80224 · Denver County · 108 certified beds · avg 87 residents/day · certified since Apr 30, 1991

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: LONG PEAK OPERATING COMPANY (8 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$845
Fines, last 3 years
2.99
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 2, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 3, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Oct 2, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 6, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Mar 7, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Aug 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure care was delivered by qualified people following each resident's written care plan — the individualized document that spells out exactly what care that resident is supposed to receive.
Aug 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Aug 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 23, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jun 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jun 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jun 23, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 11).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202250E
202380E
202420F
2025131G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $845.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 2, 2025Fine$845

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityColorado avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.993.893.95bottom 11% in Colorado; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.860.860.69top 43% in Colorado; top 23% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.653.443.50bottom 11% in Colorado; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.610.610.48top 38% in Colorado; top 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)17.047.145.8top 1% in Colorado; top 2% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)7.144.642.9top 2% in Colorado; top 3% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.87, RN 0.82, weekend 2.54. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Crestmoor SNF Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%09/01/2024
Long Peak Opco LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Beecan Health Co LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Beecan Health Co LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Dergance, JeannaeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Haskell, CynthiaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Haskell, CynthiaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Koretke, MaryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Moskowitz, JayIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Moskowitz, JayIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Moskowitz, JayIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Raskin, ChaimIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2024
Raskin, ChaimIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Stern, AkivaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Stern, AkivaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Valle, KarlaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Valle, KarlaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Berkley Manor Care Center0.2 miDenver, CO★★★★★3/5
Hilltop Park Post Acute0.8 miDenver, CO★★☆☆☆1/5
Rowan Community, INC1.7 miDenver, CO★★★★☆2/5
Amberwood Post Acute1.8 miDenver, CO★★☆☆☆2/5
Brookshire Post Acute1.8 miDenver, CO★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Center at Lowry, LLC1.8 miDenver, CO★★★☆☆2/5
Holly Heights Care and Rehabilitation1.8 miDenver, CO★★★☆☆2/5
Highline Post Acute1.8 miDenver, CO★☆☆☆☆1/5
South Valley Post Acute Rehabilitation2.0 miDenver, CO★★★★☆4/5
Lowry Hills Care and Rehabilitation2.5 miAurora, CO★★☆☆☆2/5
Suites at Clermont Park Care Center, the2.6 miDenver, CO★★★★★5/5
Highland Park Rehabilitation & Care Center2.6 miAurora, CO★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Denver →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 065290.