How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
701 King Farm Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20850 (opens Google Maps) · Montgomery County · (240) 499-9015· 45 certified beds · avg 36 residents/day · certified since Jun 30, 2009 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: INGLESIDE ENGAGED LIVING (2 facilities, chain avg rating 5.0★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. F-0921
The facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. F-0712
The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. F-0756
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. · F-0712 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint · F-0604 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · F-0622 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. · F-0624 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · from a complaint · F-0790 |
| Feb 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (14 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 15 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Maryland avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.88 | 3.83 | 3.95 | top 4% in Maryland; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.42 | 0.83 | 0.69 | top 10% in Maryland; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.55 | 3.43 | 3.50 | top 3% in Maryland; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.12 | 0.63 | 0.48 | top 6% in Maryland; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 14.9 | 40.2 | 45.8 | top 2% in Maryland; top 1% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 9.1 | 38.7 | 42.9 | top 4% in Maryland; top 3% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.28, RN 1.27, weekend 4.98.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.28 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Ingleside at King Farm. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Other
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adeniyi-Oladapo, Morinatu Ajibike | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/31/2022 |
| Adeniyi-Oladapo, Morinatu Ajibike | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/31/2022 |
| Alley, Traci | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/02/2021 |
| Baker Tilly Advisory Group LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2015 |
| Baker Tilly Us LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2015 |
| Bartels, Bruce | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/04/2015 |
| Boardman, Donald | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Bryant, Kenya | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2022 |
| Bryant, Kenya | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2022 |
| Cecchine, Margaret | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2023 |
| Cox, Sally | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Delovska-Trajkova, Dusanka | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Flagship Rehabilitation, INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2010 |
| Gleckman, Howard | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Green, Lynn | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/14/2024 |
| Green, Lynn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/14/2024 |
| Hauge, Jennifer | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Johnson, Gregg | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Katz, Ruth | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Kearney, Jonathan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 44 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 24 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Ingleside Engaged Living — 2 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shady Grove Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 1.0 mi | Rockville, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Collingswood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 1.6 mi | Rockville, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sterling Care Rockville Nursing | 2.0 mi | Rockville, MD | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Village at Rockville | 2.4 mi | Rockville, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Wilson Health Care Center | 2.7 mi | Gaithersburg, MD | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Potomac Valley Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 2.8 mi | Rockville, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Montgomery Village Care Center | 4.3 mi | Gaithersburg, MD | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Hebrew Home of Greater Washington | 5.0 mi | Rockville, MD | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Montcare at Potomac | 5.6 mi | Potomac, MD | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Bedford Court Healthcare Cent. | 5.7 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Layhill Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 6.5 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Montcare at Bethesda | 6.6 mi | Bethesda, MD | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Montgomery, MD — 34 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215353.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details