MarylandSilver Spring

Bedford Court Healthcare Cent.

3701 International Drive, Silver Spring, MD 20906 · Montgomery County · 60 certified beds · avg 43 residents/day · certified since Jan 27, 1993

Part of chain: SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING (4 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.66
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 20, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Mar 20, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give all staff the required training on its quality improvement program — the internal system for finding problems and making care better.
Mar 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Mar 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Mar 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Dec 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Dec 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Feb 27, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 27, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (13 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202020D
2024150E
2026110F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMaryland avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.663.833.95top 6% in Maryland; top 6% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.690.830.69top 49% in Maryland; top 37% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.123.433.50top 6% in Maryland; top 5% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.390.630.48bottom 26% in Maryland; bottom 50% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)19.140.245.8top 6% in Maryland; top 2% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.038.742.9bottom 26% in Maryland; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.06, RN 0.62, weekend 4.58. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Welltower INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Welltower Opco Group LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Welltower TRS Holdco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Bernstein, ChristinaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/11/2024
Bernstein, ChristinaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/11/2024
Coelho, AndrewIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/23/2022
Coelho, AndrewIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/23/2022
Falco, DeniseIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/23/2022
Falco, DeniseIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/23/2022
Frantz, EdwardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/23/2022
Frantz, EdwardIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/23/2022
Harris, TonyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/16/2025
Kessler, ThomasIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/23/2022
Kessler, ThomasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/23/2022
Kim, CeciliaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2022
Kim, CeciliaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2022
Nasrawy, CindyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/13/2024
Nasrawy, CindyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/13/2024
O'Riordan, DamienIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/16/2025
O'Riordan, DamienIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/16/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Layhill Nursing and Rehabilitation Center1.1 miSilver Spring, MD★☆☆☆☆1/5
Complete Care at Wheaton3.2 miWheaton, MD★★★★★4/5
Friends Nursing Home3.5 miSandy Spring, MD★★★★★4/5
Montcare at Wheaton3.9 miWheaton, MD★★★☆☆2/5
Brooke Grove Rehab. & Nsg Ctr4.0 miSandy Spring, MD★★☆☆☆2/5
Harmony Suites Rehabilitation and Wellness Center4.2 miSilver Spring, MD★★☆☆☆1/5
Hebrew Home of Greater Washington4.4 miRockville, MD★★★★★4/5
Turtle Creek Rehabilitation and Wellness Center4.9 miKensington, MD★★☆☆☆1/5
Potomac Valley Rehabilitation and Healthcare5.0 miRockville, MD★★★☆☆2/5
Complete Care at Springbrook5.2 miSilver Spring, MD★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Silver Spring →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215246.