How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
3701 International Drive, Silver Spring, MD 20906 (opens Google Maps) · Montgomery County · (301) 598-2900· 60 certified beds · avg 43 residents/day · certified since Jan 27, 1993 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING (4 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 28 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint F-0761
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give all staff the required training on its quality improvement program — the internal system for finding problems and making care better. · F-0944 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint · F-0585 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Dec 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (13 → 10).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 15 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 11 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Maryland avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.66 | 3.83 | 3.95 | top 6% in Maryland; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.69 | 0.83 | 0.69 | top 49% in Maryland; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.12 | 3.43 | 3.50 | top 6% in Maryland; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.39 | 0.63 | 0.48 | bottom 26% in Maryland; bottom 50% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 19.1 | 40.2 | 45.8 | top 6% in Maryland; top 2% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 38.7 | 42.9 | bottom 26% in Maryland; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.06, RN 0.62, weekend 4.58.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.06 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Bedford Court Healthcare Cent.. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Welltower INC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| Welltower Opco Group LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| Welltower TRS Holdco LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| Bernstein, Christina | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/11/2024 |
| Bernstein, Christina | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/11/2024 |
| Coelho, Andrew | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/23/2022 |
| Coelho, Andrew | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/23/2022 |
| Falco, Denise | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/23/2022 |
| Falco, Denise | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/23/2022 |
| Frantz, Edward | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/23/2022 |
| Frantz, Edward | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/23/2022 |
| Harris, Tony | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/16/2025 |
| Kessler, Thomas | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/23/2022 |
| Kessler, Thomas | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/23/2022 |
| Kim, Cecilia | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/07/2022 |
| Kim, Cecilia | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/07/2022 |
| Nasrawy, Cindy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/13/2024 |
| Nasrawy, Cindy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/13/2024 |
| O'Riordan, Damien | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/16/2025 |
| O'Riordan, Damien | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/16/2025 |
Showing 20 of 35 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 15 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Sunrise Senior Living — 4 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Layhill Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 1.1 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Complete Care at Wheaton | 3.2 mi | Wheaton, MD | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Friends Nursing Home | 3.5 mi | Sandy Spring, MD | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Montcare at Wheaton | 3.9 mi | Wheaton, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Brooke Grove Rehab. & Nsg Ctr | 4.0 mi | Sandy Spring, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Harmony Suites Rehabilitation and Wellness Center | 4.2 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Hebrew Home of Greater Washington | 4.4 mi | Rockville, MD | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Turtle Creek Rehabilitation and Wellness Center | 4.9 mi | Kensington, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Potomac Valley Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 5.0 mi | Rockville, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Complete Care at Springbrook | 5.2 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sterling Care Rockville Nursing | 5.3 mi | Rockville, MD | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Arcola | 5.4 mi | Silver Spring, MD | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Montgomery, MD — 34 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215246.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details