MississippiByram

Willow Creek Retirement Center

49 Willow Creek Lane, Byram, MS 39272 · Hinds County · 88 certified beds · avg 79 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 2003

Part of chain: BRIAR HILL MANAGEMENT (6 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,018
Fines, last 3 years
4.99
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 12, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 5, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 4, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Jan 6, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Sep 12, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Mar 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Mar 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Aug 11, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 11, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Feb 23, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 23, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Feb 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Feb 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Feb 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380F
202481G ▲
2026100F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,018.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 12, 2024Fine$8,018

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMississippi avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.994.883.95top 36% in Mississippi; top 13% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.680.740.69top 47% in Mississippi; top 39% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.484.093.50top 22% in Mississippi; top 12% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.330.380.48top 47% in Mississippi; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.945.745.8bottom 29% in Mississippi; bottom 30% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)57.138.442.9bottom 20% in Mississippi; bottom 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.05, RN 0.55, weekend 3.64. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Philippe, LynnIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2008
Rotolo, DavidIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2008
Rotolo, RobertIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2008
Briar Hill Management, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/03/2003
Briar Hill Management, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Burlison, SandyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/25/2019
Burlison, SandyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/25/2019
Burns, SharonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2008
Burns, SharonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2008
Estes, TimothyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/11/2008
Green, DonnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/04/2010
Green, DonnaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/04/2010
King, CurtisIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2016
King, CurtisIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2016
Muha, AshleyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/04/2010
Muha, AshleyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/04/2010
Omnicare LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2017
Philippe, LynnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2008
Rotolo, DavidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2008
Rotolo, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2008

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Edgewood Health & Rehabilitation2.2 miByram, MS★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Pleasant Hills Community Living Center4.5 miJackson, MS★☆☆☆☆2/5
Chadwick Community Care Center4.9 miJackson, MS★☆☆☆☆2/5
Methodist Sepcialty Care Center7.2 miFlowood, MS★★★★★4/5
Woodlands Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center7.7 miClinton, MS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Compere NH INC8.3 miJackson, MS★★★★☆4/5
Briar Hill Rest Home8.7 miFlorence, MS★★☆☆☆3/5
Magnolia Senior Care, LLC9.9 miJackson, MS★★★★☆3/5
Clinton Healthcare LLC - SNF10.0 miClinton, MS★★★★☆4/5
Lakeland Community Care Center10.7 miJackson, MS★★☆☆☆2/5
Alyce G Clarke Center for Medically Fragile Childr11.2 miJackson, MS—/5
Pine Forest Health and Rehabilitation11.4 miJackson, MS★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Byram →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 255300.