Mississippi ›Florence

Briar Hill Rest Home

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

1201 Gunter Road, Florence, MS 39073 (opens Google Maps) · Rankin County · (601) 939-6371· 60 certified beds · avg 54 residents/day · certified since Sep 5, 2003 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: BRIAR HILL MANAGEMENT (6 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jan 22, 2026
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Apr 9, 2025
$8,788
Fines, last 3 years
4.88
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 9, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Apr 30, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint F-0558

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint F-0921

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not post the names, addresses, and phone numbers of state agencies and advocacy groups, along with a notice that residents may file complaints with the state survey agency. F-0575

View all 14 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 28, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint · F-0558
May 28, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint · F-0921
Jan 22, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not post the names, addresses, and phone numbers of state agencies and advocacy groups, along with a notice that residents may file complaints with the state survey agency. · F-0575
Jan 22, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Jan 22, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Apr 9, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600
Aug 15, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Aug 15, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602
Aug 15, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656
Aug 15, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Aug 15, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732
Aug 15, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759
Aug 15, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803
Jan 19, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 3).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2026
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310D
202470E
202511G ▲
202650E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

1 fine totaling $8,788.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 9, 2025Fine$8,788

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityMississippi averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.88
Mississippi average: 4.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.84
Mississippi average: 0.74
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.13
Mississippi average: 4.09
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityMississippi avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.884.883.95top 39% in Mississippi; top 15% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.840.740.69top 26% in Mississippi; top 24% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.134.093.50top 36% in Mississippi; top 19% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.380.380.48top 32% in Mississippi; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.945.745.8bottom 29% in Mississippi; bottom 30% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.338.442.9top 39% in Mississippi; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.32, RN 0.74, weekend 3.65.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.32 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Briar Hill Rest Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Philippe, LynnIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/17/2002
Rotolo, DavidIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/17/2002
Rotolo, RobertIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/17/2002
B.H.R.H. Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/11/2003
Briar Hill Management, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/03/2003
Briar Hill Management, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Burlison, SandyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/25/2019
Burlison, SandyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/25/2019
Burns, SharonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2008
Burns, SharonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/28/2008
Davis, TracyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/22/2024
Davis, TracyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/22/2024
Estes, TimothyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/11/2008
Freeman, JamesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/05/2026
Freeman, JamesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/05/2026
Green, DonnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/04/2010
Green, DonnaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/04/2010
King, CurtisIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2016
King, CurtisIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2016
Muha, AshleyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/04/2010

Showing 20 of 32 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 12 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Briar Hill Management — 6 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
  • "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
  • "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
  • "Where do you post the contact information for the state agency and the ombudsman, in case we ever need to file a complaint?"
  • "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
  • "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
  • "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
  • "What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 53% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 32 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 23 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Jnh-Jaquith Inn5.0 miWhitfield, MS★★★★★4/5
Jnh-Jefferson Inn5.0 miWhitfield, MS★★★★★3/5
Jnh-Madison Inn5.0 miWhitfield, MS★★★★★5/5
Methodist Sepcialty Care Center8.1 miFlowood, MS★★★★★4/5
Edgewood Health & Rehabilitation8.4 miByram, MS★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Wisteria Gardens8.4 miPearl, MS★★★☆☆4/5
Willow Creek Retirement Center8.7 miByram, MS★★☆☆☆2/5
Brandon Community Care Center9.1 miBrandon, MS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Brandon Court9.3 miBrandon, MS★★★★☆4/5
Compere NH INC9.3 miJackson, MS★★★★☆4/5
Pleasant Hills Community Living Center10.2 miJackson, MS★☆☆☆☆2/5
Chadwick Community Care Center10.6 miJackson, MS★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Rankin, MS — 8 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Florence →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 255303.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details