3701 Peter Quinn Drive, Jackson, MS 39213 (opens Google Maps) · Hinds County · (601) 366-1712· 60 certified beds · avg 57 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 2001 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 10, 2025 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 5, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 10, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 5, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. F-0851
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 16, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Apr 16, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851 |
| Apr 16, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Feb 10, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Feb 10, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Dec 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Dec 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs. · F-0800 |
| Jun 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jun 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jun 15, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 2 | 2 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $8,542.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2025 | Fine | $4,271 |
| Feb 10, 2025 | Fine | $4,271 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Mississippi avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.50 | 4.88 | 3.95 | bottom 43% in Mississippi; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.41 | 0.74 | 0.69 | bottom 9% in Mississippi; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.83 | 4.09 | 3.50 | bottom 44% in Mississippi; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.28 | 0.38 | 0.48 | bottom 46% in Mississippi; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 41.0 | 45.7 | 45.8 | top 38% in Mississippi; top 39% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 38.4 | 42.9 | bottom 35% in Mississippi; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.14, RN 0.38, weekend 3.52.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.14 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Magnolia Senior Care, LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tillman Senior Care, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/2017 |
| Estes, Timothy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2025 |
| Montgomery, Andrew | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2022 |
| Montgomery, Andrew | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2022 |
| Stephens, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/14/2025 |
| Tillman, Clifford | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2015 |
All 6 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pine Forest Health and Rehabilitation | 2.7 mi | Jackson, MS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Manhattan Community Care Center | 4.8 mi | Jackson, MS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Clinton Healthcare LLC - SNF | 4.9 mi | Clinton, MS | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Compere NH INC | 5.0 mi | Jackson, MS | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Chadwick Community Care Center | 5.0 mi | Jackson, MS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Woodlands Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 5.4 mi | Clinton, MS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Pleasant Hills Community Living Center | 5.4 mi | Jackson, MS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lakeland Community Care Center | 5.4 mi | Jackson, MS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Alyce G Clarke Center for Medically Fragile Childr | 5.5 mi | Jackson, MS | —/5 | ||
| Methodist Sepcialty Care Center | 5.8 mi | Flowood, MS | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Highland Home | 6.6 mi | Ridgeland, MS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Willow Creek Retirement Center | 9.9 mi | Byram, MS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Hinds, MS — 9 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 255275.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details