How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
415 Cook Springs, Pell City, AL 35125 (opens Google Maps) · St. Clair County · (205) 338-2221· 168 certified beds · avg 132 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1977 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: NOLAND HEALTH (10 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jul 28, 2019 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 19, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jul 28, 2019 · F-0656
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 19, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jul 28, 2019 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 19, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint F-0677
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. F-0600
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Dec 20, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jul 28, 2019 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Jul 28, 2019 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jul 28, 2019 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jul 28, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Jul 28, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 16, 2018 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 16, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Aug 16, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Aug 16, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Aug 16, 2018 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2019 | 5 | 3 | J ▲ |
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Alabama avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.35 | 4.43 | 3.95 | bottom 45% in Alabama; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.61 | 0.74 | 0.69 | bottom 30% in Alabama; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.72 | 3.73 | 3.50 | top 47% in Alabama; top 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.26 | 0.36 | 0.48 | bottom 28% in Alabama; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 57.7 | 46.9 | 45.8 | bottom 17% in Alabama; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 57.1 | 39.5 | 42.9 | bottom 19% in Alabama; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.71, RN 0.52, weekend 3.18.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.71 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Village at Cook Springs Skilled Nursing Facility. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adamson, Michele | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2017 |
| Adamson, Michele | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2017 |
| Blackwell, Crystal | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/09/2025 |
| Blackwell, Crystal | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/09/2025 |
| Britton, Isaac | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/27/2013 |
| Britton, Isaac | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/27/2013 |
| Buterworth, Beronica | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/02/2023 |
| Buterworth, Beronica | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/02/2023 |
| Estep, Barbara | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Estep, Barbara | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Estep, Barbara | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Estep, Barbara | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| Flippo Enterprises LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2018 |
| Flippo, Gregory | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/02/2009 |
| Flippo, Gregory | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/02/2009 |
| Goff, Robert | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/10/2005 |
| Goff, Robert | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/10/2005 |
| Hall, Matthew | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2022 |
| Hall, Matthew | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2022 |
| Hall, Matthew | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/31/2022 |
Showing 20 of 44 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 24 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Noland Health — 10 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 9 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diversicare of Pell City | 4.6 mi | Pell City, AL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Meadowview Nursing Center | 6.1 mi | Pell City, AL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Cavalier Healthcare of Trussville | 12.6 mi | Trussville, AL | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Kirkwood by the River | 14.9 mi | Birmingham, AL | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Highlands Rehabilitation and Wellness Center | 15.9 mi | Birmingham, AL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| East Glen | 15.9 mi | Birmingham, AL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Healthcare Center of Eastview | 19.3 mi | Birmingham, AL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| St Martin's in the Pines | 19.5 mi | Irondale, AL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Health Care INC | 19.7 mi | Ashville, AL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 015195.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details