CaliforniaPasadena

Villa Gardens Health Care Unit

842 East Villa Street, Pasadena, CA 91101 · Los Angeles County · 54 certified beds · avg 44 residents/day · certified since Jul 31, 1990

Part of chain: FRONT PORCH (9 facilities, chain avg rating 4.8★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.15
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (31)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 5, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Dec 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Dec 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Dec 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Oct 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Oct 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Oct 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Oct 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Oct 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Oct 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Jan 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jan 31, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Oct 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Oct 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Oct 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Oct 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Oct 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint
Aug 24, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023110E
2024110E
202590F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.154.313.95top 12% in California; top 11% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.560.610.69top 38% in California; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.573.903.50top 12% in California; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.400.510.48top 45% in California; top 48% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)21.836.745.8top 11% in California; top 4% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.038.142.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.06, RN 0.55, weekend 4.48. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Front Porch Communities and ServicesOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%10/01/2006
Akopyan, GevorkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/12/2022
Dudley, LeslieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Dudley, LeslieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Duranteau, NancyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Forte, VincentIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Handy, JoanneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Jackson, KarlisaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/29/2023
Jacobs, LauraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Kelly, SeanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2023
Kelly, SeanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2023
Kroeker, KevinIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Macango, SusanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/04/2026
McGovern, MarionIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
McMullin, MaryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Merkin, NickolasIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/30/2025
Nelson, HarryIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/30/2025
Niblett, JoelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/17/2026
Niblett, JoelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2026
Olson, KariIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2001

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Pasadena Grove Health Center1.6 miPasadena, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Foothill Heights Care Center1.7 miPasadena, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Pasadena Nursing Center1.7 miPasadena, CA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Cedar Pine Post Acute1.8 miPasadena, CA★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Gem Tcu1.8 miPasadena, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Californian Pasadena Healthcare1.9 miPasadena, CA★★★☆☆3/5
The Bellefontaine Healthcare Center1.9 miPasadena, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Saint Vincent Healthcare1.9 miPasadena, CA★★★☆☆4/5
Brighton Care Center2.0 miPasadena, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Pasadena Park Healthcare and Wellness Center2.0 miPasadena, CA★★☆☆☆3/5
Golden Rose Care Center2.0 miPasadena, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Camellia Gardens Care Center2.0 miPasadena, CA★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Pasadena →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555429.