7341 E Alexandria Pike, Alexandria, KY 41001 (opens Google Maps) · Campbell County · (859) 694-4450· 117 certified beds · avg 108 residents/day · certified since Jun 30, 2018 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, widespread · Aug 15, 2025 · F-0880 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.
Severity (L): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was widespread: a systemic or pervasive problem. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 4, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Aug 14, 2024 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 22, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Aug 14, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 22, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jun 6, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 13, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jun 6, 2024 · F-0607 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Why it matters: Without working prevention policies, mistreatment is more likely to happen and less likely to be caught.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 13, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 26, 2022 · F-0656
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 23, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 26, 2022 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 23, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2025 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Aug 15, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 15, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Aug 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Aug 14, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Aug 14, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jun 6, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Jun 6, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607 |
| Jun 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| May 26, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| May 26, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| May 26, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 26, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 16, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| May 16, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 16, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| May 16, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 4 | 2 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 5 | 4 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 4 | 1 | L ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $246,139.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2025 | Fine | $19,955 |
| Jun 6, 2024 | Fine | $226,184 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Kentucky avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.38 | 3.71 | 3.95 | top 16% in Kentucky; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.69 | bottom 49% in Kentucky; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.94 | 3.27 | 3.50 | top 15% in Kentucky; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.41 | 0.53 | 0.48 | bottom 44% in Kentucky; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.3 | 46.4 | 45.8 | bottom 33% in Kentucky; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 37.5 | 41.8 | 42.9 | top 46% in Kentucky; top 42% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.43, RN 0.64, weekend 3.99.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.43 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Seasons at Alexandria. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chilelli, Justine | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Concept Rehab, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Dorsey, Josh | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Dressman, Jim | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/08/2017 |
| Epplen, Steve | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Hamberg, Joyce | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Hargis & Associates, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Levermann, Jack | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Macke, Dave | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| McIntosh, Effie | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2020 |
| Pavlou, Maria | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Pavlou, Maria | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Richardson, Kevin | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Santos, William | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/10/2018 |
| Schreiner Spille, Christina | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Stroud, Reva | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Stroud, Reva | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coldspring Transitional Care Center | 1.9 mi | Cold Spring, KY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Carmel Manor | 5.9 mi | Fort Thomas, KY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Residence at Salem Woods | 6.3 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Rosedale Green | 6.6 mi | Covington, KY | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Mount Washington Care Center | 6.7 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Highlandspring of Ft Thomas | 7.1 mi | Fort Thomas, KY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Anderson, the | 7.1 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| St Elizabeth Ft Thomas SNF | 7.4 mi | Fort Thomas, KY | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| The Pavilion at Kenton | 7.9 mi | Covington, KY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Siena Gardens Rehabilitation & Transitional Care | 8.3 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Atlantes the | 8.7 mi | Cincinnati, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| St Elizabeth Edgewood SNF | 9.1 mi | Edgewood, KY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 185484.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details