How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
The Boulevard Post Acute
9229 Arlington Blvd, Fairfax, VA 22031 (opens Google Maps) · Fairfax City County · (703) 385-0555· 81 certified beds · avg 74 residents/day · certified since Apr 3, 1997 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Apr 9, 2026
3
Serious findings on record
most recent Apr 9, 2026
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.36
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 9, 2026 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 9, 2026 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 5, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 10, 2022 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 10, 2022 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 22, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 27, 2020 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 27, 2020 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 17, 2020 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 33 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
View all 33 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 9, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Apr 9, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents the required written notice of their rights, the facility's rules, the services offered, and what those services cost. · F-0572 |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents important notices in a format and language they can understand — for example, translated documents or accessible formats for those with vision or hearing loss. · F-0574 |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · F-0790 |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Apr 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 10, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Mar 10, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Mar 10, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Mar 10, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Mar 10, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Mar 10, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · F-0887 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. · F-0744 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows. · F-0808 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not give residents important notices in a format and language they can understand — for example, translated documents or accessible formats for those with vision or hearing loss. · F-0574 |
| Feb 27, 2020 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post the names, addresses, and phone numbers of state agencies and advocacy groups, along with a notice that residents may file complaints with the state survey agency. · F-0575 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 15).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2020
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2022
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2026
All citations: 15
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 12 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2022 | 6 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 15 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityVirginia averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.36
Virginia average: 3.67
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.83
Virginia average: 0.66
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.07
Virginia average: 3.21
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Virginia avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.36 | 3.67 | 3.95 | bottom 50% in Virginia; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.83 | 0.66 | 0.69 | top 17% in Virginia; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.07 | 3.21 | 3.50 | top 39% in Virginia; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.69 | 0.46 | 0.48 | top 12% in Virginia; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 42.0 | 48.1 | 45.8 | top 33% in Virginia; top 42% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 52.9 | 48.2 | 42.9 | bottom 42% in Virginia; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.15, RN 1.02, weekend 3.79.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.15 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Boulevard Post Acute. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boulevard Holdco LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| NFR 2020 Irrv Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Quinto Nexgen LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Rsbrmk Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| SK Nexgen Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Skilled Venture LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Tryko Nexgen Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Uak 2020 Irrv Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Ukr Nexgen LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Yk Nexgen Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Yr Nexgen Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Bhardwaj, Prita | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Bhardwaj, Prita | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Boulevard Leasehold LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2025 |
| Eagle Bank | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Law, Joseph | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/10/2020 |
| Law, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/10/2020 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/06/2025 |
| Pharmerica Drug Systems LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2025 |
Showing 20 of 29 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 9 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Marquis Health Services — 87 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Westmoreland Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center — Colonial Beach, VA · overall 3/5
- Woodbine Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center — Alexandria, VA · overall 5/5
- York Post Acute — Yorktown, VA · overall 2/5abuse
- Riverside Post Acute — Jacksonville, FL · overall 3/5
- West Gables Health Care Center — Miami, FL · overall 5/5
- Birchwood Plaza — Chicago, IL · overall 4/5
- Dobson Plaza — Evanston, IL · overall 5/5
- Aspen Hill Rehabiliation & Healthcare Center — Haverhill, MA · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 86 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can I get a written copy of resident rights, house rules, and a full list of services and charges today?"
- "How do you communicate important notices to residents who speak another language or have trouble seeing or hearing?"
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 42% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 29 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 79 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| August Healthcare at Iliff | 2.9 mi | Dunn Loring, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Fairfax Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 3.0 mi | Fairfax, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Annandale Healthcare Center | 5.1 mi | Annandale, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| August Healthcare at Leewood | 5.4 mi | Annandale, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Burke Health & Rehabilitation Center | 5.6 mi | Burke, VA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Vierra Falls Church | 6.1 mi | Falls Church, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Fair Oaks Health & Rehabilitation | 6.2 mi | Fairfax, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Arleigh Burke Pavilion | 7.0 mi | MC Lean, VA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Carlin Springs Health & Rehabilitation | 7.3 mi | Arlington, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Greenspring Village | 7.5 mi | Springfield, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Goodwin House Bailey's Crossroads | 7.8 mi | Falls Church, VA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Jefferson | 8.2 mi | Arlington, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 495319.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).