KansasTopeka

Tanglewood Nursing & Rehabilitation

5015 SW 28th Street, Topeka, KS 66614 · Shawnee County · 54 certified beds · avg 47 residents/day · certified since Apr 12, 2003

SFF Candidate

Part of chain: HMG HEALTHCARE (31 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$227,440
Fines, last 3 years
3.01
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Oct 17, 2024 · F-0584 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.

Why it matters: An unsafe or unclean environment affects residents' health, comfort, and dignity every single day.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Dec 5, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 17, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 18, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 17, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 5, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (45)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Oct 17, 2024▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · from a complaint
Jun 17, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Apr 18, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 18, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Apr 18, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Apr 18, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Apr 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Apr 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Apr 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Apr 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Apr 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Apr 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Dec 8, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Dec 8, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 8, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Dec 8, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 8, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (14 → 25).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202150E
2023140F
2024263K ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $227,440, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 17, 2024Fine$86,141
Oct 17, 2024Payment Denial20 days from Nov 15, 2024
Jun 17, 2024Fine$141,299

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.014.583.95bottom 6% in Kansas; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.430.810.69bottom 10% in Kansas; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.714.053.50bottom 6% in Kansas; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.300.490.48bottom 17% in Kansas; bottom 31% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)71.248.145.8bottom 7% in Kansas; bottom 5% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)60.042.042.9bottom 24% in Kansas; bottom 22% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.78, RN 0.39, weekend 2.50. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Balsamo, KrystalIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/29/2021
Balsamo, KrystalIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/29/2021
Blome, SherylIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/26/2024
Blome, SherylIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/26/2024
CCP Westwood Manor 7348 LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2014
Cibc Bank USAOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2024
Cibc Bank USAOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2018
Culp, RolandIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2014
Culp, RolandIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/04/2014
Daspit, LaurenceIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2014
Daspit, LaurenceIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2014
Dohn, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2019
Dohn, WilliamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2016
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/24/2018
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/07/2013
Gaut, KenishaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/06/2017
Gaut, KenishaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/06/2017
Healthmark Group LTDOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2014
HMG Healthcare LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2025
HMG Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Plaza West Healthcare and Rehab1.9 miTopeka, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Rolling Hills Health Center2.3 miTopeka, KS★★☆☆☆2/5
Lexington Park Nursing & Post Acute Center2.3 miTopeka, KS★★★★★5/5
Heritage Grove Estates2.6 miTopeka, KS★★★★☆4/5
Brewster Health Center2.6 miTopeka, KS★★★★★4/5
The Gardens at Aldersgate2.7 miTopeka, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Topeka Presbyterian Manor2.9 miTopeka, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Healthcare Resort of Topeka3.2 miTopeka, KS★★★★★5/5
Brighton Place West3.5 miTopeka, KS★★☆☆☆2/5
Providence Living Center5.1 miTopeka, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Legacy on 10th Avenue5.2 miTopeka, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Brighton Place North5.8 miTopeka, KS★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Topeka →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175463.