Rolling Hills Health Center
2400 SW Urish Road, Topeka, KS 66614 · Shawnee County · 70 certified beds · avg 43 residents/day · certified since Sep 8, 1987
Part of chain: MIDWEST HEALTH (11 facilities, chain avg rating 3.9★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$14,186
Fines, last 3 years
3.88
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 2, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Jan 30, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
All citations in the current public record (42)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. |
| Jul 29, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jul 29, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jul 29, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. |
| Jul 29, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jul 29, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Jul 29, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Jul 29, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Jul 29, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. |
| Jul 29, 2025 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. |
| Jun 2, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jan 11, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. |
| Jan 11, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. |
| Jan 11, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. |
| Jan 11, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jan 11, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Jan 11, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Jan 11, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jan 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Jan 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. |
| Jan 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Jan 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Jan 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Jan 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jan 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Jan 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Jan 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. |
| Jan 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Jan 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Jul 14, 2022 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. |
| Jul 14, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Jul 14, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Jul 14, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. |
| Jul 14, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Jul 14, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jul 14, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Jul 14, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Jul 14, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Jul 14, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Jul 14, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Jul 14, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. |
| Jul 14, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (18 → 10).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 13 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 18 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 11 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $14,186.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2025 | Fine | $14,186 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Kansas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.88 | 4.58 | 3.95 | bottom 31% in Kansas; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.69 | 0.81 | 0.69 | bottom 46% in Kansas; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.29 | 4.05 | 3.50 | bottom 24% in Kansas; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 44% in Kansas; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 53.5 | 48.1 | 45.8 | bottom 34% in Kansas; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 20.0 | 42.0 | 42.9 | top 18% in Kansas; top 13% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.27, RN 0.58, weekend 2.77. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Floyd C Eaton III Trust 2012 | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2016 |
| James Brett Klausman Trust 2012 | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2016 |
| Jamie N Eaton Trust 2012 | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2016 |
| Klaton Enterprises, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/11/2011 |
| Klausman, James | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/09/2003 |
| Michael Graham Klausman Trust 2012 | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2016 |
| Rolling Hills Health Center Operations, LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/11/2011 |
| Eaton, Floyd | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/09/2003 |
| Floyd C Eaton III Trust 2012 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/07/2024 |
| James Brett Klausman Trust 2012 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/07/2024 |
| Jamie N Eaton Trust 2012 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/07/2024 |
| Klaton Enterprises, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2024 |
| Klausman, James | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/09/2003 |
| Klausman, James | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/07/2024 |
| Michael Graham Klausman Trust 2012 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/07/2024 |
| Midwest Health, INC. 06122001 | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Midwest Health, INC. 06122001 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/07/2024 |
| Rolling Hills Health Center Operations, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/11/2011 |
| Toland, Tammi | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/26/2022 |
| Toland, Tammi | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/25/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How many hours a day is a registered nurse physically in the building, including weekends?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Gardens at Aldersgate | 1.1 mi | Topeka, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Plaza West Healthcare and Rehab | 1.5 mi | Topeka, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Tanglewood Nursing & Rehabilitation | 2.3 mi | Topeka, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| The Healthcare Resort of Topeka | 2.4 mi | Topeka, KS | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Topeka Presbyterian Manor | 3.2 mi | Topeka, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Lexington Park Nursing & Post Acute Center | 3.3 mi | Topeka, KS | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Brighton Place West | 4.4 mi | Topeka, KS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Heritage Grove Estates | 4.8 mi | Topeka, KS | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Brewster Health Center | 4.9 mi | Topeka, KS | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Providence Living Center | 7.2 mi | Topeka, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Legacy on 10th Avenue | 7.2 mi | Topeka, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Brighton Place North | 7.3 mi | Topeka, KS | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175165.