CaliforniaSanta Rosa

Summerfield Health Care Center

1280 Summerfield Rd, Santa Rosa, CA 95405 · Sonoma County · 70 certified beds · avg 53 residents/day · certified since Jun 21, 1972

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.92
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint
Mar 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Mar 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Mar 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Mar 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Mar 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jan 14, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 14, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 14, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 14, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Jan 14, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202250F
2024110E
202520D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.924.313.95bottom 35% in California; top 43% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.910.610.69top 13% in California; top 20% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.303.903.50bottom 17% in California; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.770.510.48top 12% in California; top 13% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)34.836.745.8top 45% in California; top 24% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.038.142.9bottom 29% in California; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.44, RN 1.03, weekend 3.74. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2006
Bush, CasonIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Bush, CasonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Bush, CasonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2002
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Port, BarryIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/11/2025
Sae, AynnaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Sae, AynnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Sae, AynnaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Summerfield Development CompanyOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2000
Willits, AdamIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Santa Rosa Post Acute0.6 miSanta Rosa, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Park View Post Acute0.8 miSanta Rosa, CA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Spring Lake Village1.4 miSanta Rosa, CA★★★★★4/5
Blue Oak Post-Acute2.7 miSanta Rosa, CA★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Northvine Postacute Care3.6 miSanta Rosa, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Arbol Healthcare Center of Santa Rosa4.3 miSanta Rosa, CA★★★★★4/5
Apple Valley Post-Acute Rehab9.5 miSebastopol, CA★★★★★4/5
Vineyard Post Acute13.2 miPetaluma, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Valley of the Moon Post Acute14.9 miSonoma, CA★★★☆☆2/5abuse
North Bay Post Acute15.1 miPetaluma, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Sonoma Post Acute15.3 miSonoma, CA★★★★☆3/5
Hillcrest Post Acute15.3 miPetaluma, CA★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Santa Rosa →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 056364.