DelawareGreenville

Stonegates

4031 Kennett Pike, Greenville, DE 19807 · New Castle County · 49 certified beds · avg 28 residents/day · certified since Jun 22, 1984

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$48,696
Fines, last 3 years
8.26
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 5, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jan 18, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Dec 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Dec 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.
Dec 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give all staff the required training on its quality improvement program — the internal system for finding problems and making care better.
Dec 6, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 6, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Dec 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
Dec 5, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Dec 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have doctor's orders in place for a resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Dec 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202391J ▲
202450F
202560D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $48,696.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 5, 2023Fine$48,696

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityDelaware avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)8.264.673.95top 7% in Delaware; top 1% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours2.791.040.69top 5% in Delaware; top 1% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing7.124.183.50top 5% in Delaware; top 1% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.680.640.48top 7% in Delaware; top 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)26.441.345.8top 10% in Delaware; top 9% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)5.941.242.9top 1% in Delaware; top 2% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.96, RN 2.01, weekend 5.14. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Partnership

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cantera Tr UaOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/17/2019
Cantera Tr UaOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/17/2019
Cantera Tr UaOrganizationTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/17/2019
Cantera Tr UaOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/17/2019
Dennis, MicheleIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Dennis, MicheleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Locurcio, CescaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Locurcio, CescaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Willowbrooke Court at Country House0.9 miWilmington, DE★★★★★5/5
Excelcare at Wilmington LLC2.3 miWilmington, DE★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Kentmere Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center2.6 miWilmington, DE★★★☆☆3/5
Regal Heights Healthcare & Rehab Center3.0 miHockessin, DE★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Regency Healthcare & Rehab Center3.1 miWilmington, DE★★★★☆4/5
Gilpin Hall3.2 miWilmington, DE★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Willowbrooke Court at Cokesbury Village3.4 miHockessin, DE★★★★★4/5
Coral Springs Rehab & Healthcare3.4 miWilmington, DE★★☆☆☆2/5
Complete Care at Hillside LLC3.5 miWilmington, DE★★★★☆3/5
Wilmington Nursing & Rehabilitation Center3.6 miWilmington, DE—/5abuseSFF
Cadia Rehabilitation Silverside3.8 miWilmington, DE★★★★★3/5
Encore at Foulk4.1 miWilmington, DE★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Greenville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 085026.